Optional@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 个月前A TL;DR of the Goldman-Sachs AI Criticismlemmy.worldimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1657
arrow-up1657imageA TL;DR of the Goldman-Sachs AI Criticismlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square90fedilink
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eeMlinkfedilinkarrow-up64·2 个月前What trillion dollar problem is it solving? In the minds of investors, that “problem” is paying people for labor.
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 个月前Even when the same people need to get money from people they don’t wanna pay (or there aren’t any buyers), this is still the case. So if GDP doesn’t come from nature (which it shouldn’t, at least net shouldn’t), the system cannot work with financial wealth being the only goal. But it can work long enough to destroy much of everything everywhere.
minus-squarenilloc@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Yeah I’m far more worried capitalist tech morons ending humanity, than I am about AI deciding to off us.
What trillion dollar problem is it solving? In the minds of investors, that “problem” is paying people for labor.
Even when the same people need to get money from people they don’t wanna pay (or there aren’t any buyers), this is still the case.
So if GDP doesn’t come from nature (which it shouldn’t, at least net shouldn’t), the system cannot work with financial wealth being the only goal.
But it can work long enough to destroy much of everything everywhere.
Yeah I’m far more worried capitalist tech morons ending humanity, than I am about AI deciding to off us.