“Nazi leader celebrates murder of Jews”
— 1934
“Confederate leader celebrates lynching of escaped slave”
— 1864
Hateful person does some hateful shit. News at 11.
The thing is, these people always claim that their discrimination is “for the children”. It was never about the children, and always about the hate.
Right Wingers: We need to protect children
*Child gets abused*
RW: BASED!
At this point, they’re not even pretending to give a fuck about the children.
They only actually care about straight Christian children, everyone else’s is less than
Straight, *white, Christian children
Strange that they tend to put their dicks in those straight white christian children too…
It’s to ensure the kids’ backs are straight when bent over
no no, they absolutely want to give a fuck or two to children.
They only want to protect straight and cis children.
Conservatives and harming people - a match made in Heaven
Removed by mod
Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit. Chaya Raichik is a piece of shit.
Removed by mod
This is bad.
Ice reportedly made of frozen water
Why not just say that you DGAF instead of being ambiguous?
I don’t understand how it’s news that someone who is known to do that sort of things does that sort of things
Dbt says the same type thing above
Essentially, you’re so worn out seeing this that instead of horrifying you, it just gets a, “And the sky is blue, what else is new?” response, correct?
If so, you might need a break from the internet. Becoming numb to this stuff is not healthy
There will always be horrible people, doing horrible acts it’s not a surprise nor newsworthy.
Do we need an article tomorrow when that same hate group leader says the N word?
He’s watching a video.
It’s not like he’s the one who did the act.
I sympathize with the victim but don’t see how this is any more relevant to society than the root of the child was hurt which should be it’s own article and call to action
We kinda do need these articles. These people push a narrative that they’re just “concerned about the children” and trying to save them from “groomers” (ie anyone who allows them the freedom and agency to figure themselves out and express themselves). Articles like this poke holes in the image they project, and show them for the monsters they really are.
Yes, you already know they’re monsters. So do I. But clearly, not everyone has gotten the message yet, and if we ignore their monstrous acts and words, those people will be left to listen to the narrative they do get.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
careful, calling someone a bot will get you banned here, apparently. 🤷♂️
(see the other fork in this thread)
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
a grandfather putting someone in a headlock? Is that even legally considered to be abuse, i’m pretty sure if you lost your footing in the headlock there is a non insignificant chance that you injure or kill your grandfather. Unless this is one of those “my family has children at the age of 20” type families.
“Put in a headlock and thrown to the ground” doesn’t just sound like playful wrestling to me.
thrown to the ground definitely wouldn’t count. Just a headlock could though.
Abuse doesn’t require the abuser to cause injuries. Reacting violently to an innocuous request is abuse enough.
true, i didn’t read the article, as most articles are generally rather shit, and there was a summary, not sure what the point of the summary would be if not to skip the article, anyway those were just my immediate thoughts on the statement.
