The term originally characterized farmers that had a red neck, caused by sunburn from long hours working in the fields. A citation from 1893 provides a definition as “poorer inhabitants of the rural districts … men who work in the field, as a matter of course, generally have their skin stained red and burnt by the sun, and especially is this true of the back of their necks”.[12] Hats were usually worn and they protected that wearer’s head from the sun, but also provided psychological protection by shading the face from close scrutiny.[13] The back of the neck however was more exposed to the sun and allowed closer scrutiny about the person’s background in the same way callused working hands could not be easily covered.

By 1900, “rednecks” was in common use to designate the political factions inside the Democratic Party comprising poor white farmers in the South.[14] The same group was also often called the “wool hat boys” (for they opposed the rich men, who wore expensive silk hats). A newspaper notice in Mississippi in August 1891 called on rednecks to rally at the polls at the upcoming primary election:[15]

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kids out here learning the basics of life on social media.

      Kids, remember the vast majority of mortgage payments are in interest alone. Also “mortgage” means “death contract”.
      And beer before liquor, never been sicker.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Kids out here learning the basics of life on social media.”

        Well, they gotta learn SOMEWHERE! We certainly have dismantled public education to be less of a school and more of a free daycare.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          i think the bigger thing here is how broke teens and young adults don’t have many places else to hang out and do this in person.

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I feel most people my age remember things like $1 or less beers and cheap bar food like 25 cent chicken wings? And just generally being able to hang out with couch change, like look we pooled $10 we can go out. The youth now have $12 cocktails and $7 french fries at the sketchy af “dive bar”, $20 drinks and $20 entrees if they dare step into a real place or heaven forbid an applebees.

      • StitchIsABitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, it’s also interesting for non native speakers who never thought about it, or just didn’t make the connection. I always assumed that was the reason for the term, but it’s nice to have confirmation.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        honestly its less about mixing and more about the quantity you drink. at the end alcohol is alcohol, its just that the prior consumption of it makes you more likely to get overconfident and take things too far.

        anyway, its one those you have to live to learn what your limits are, so the point is moot anyway. finding the sweet spot and managing to stay there takes a bit of experience.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right? I don’t think anyone ever even told me that was the origin, it just sort of made sense intuitively.

      • SlothMama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I thought everyone kinda intuitively understood this because redneck and farmer used to be synonymous.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I live in a part of America where it’s repeated constantly to school kids. Also, that’s not actually the origin; the red necks were militant unionists who fought for collective bargaining rights in the Coal Wars, the part of American history that never gets taught.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Other sources were already posted in the comments showing that “redneck” referring to farmers predates its usage to refer to coal miners/communists. Definitely agree there’s a lot of stuff conveniently left out of our history books, though.

  • anywho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some people have great trouble splitting words into their component parts, as if their internal GPT just stores everything as single token like “redneck”, so they never split it semantically or conceptually into red+neck.

      • anywho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I guess Germans do need to be particularly good at this, based on the mega words they can have.

        On the other hand, when listening to American Youtubers read something onscreen, it seems like they use some internal rainbow table to look up prefixes of words, and then just autocomplete the word based on probability.

        I say this because during reading they often substitute words with some that sound similar, but are not semantically close to what is written.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s one of the reasons it was popularized - coal miner unions wearing red bandanas. But late 19th century usage appears to be sunburnt workers.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Interesting. It’s kind of interesting, but in the battle of Blair mountain, there’s definitely some hints that there were already communist and anti-communist sentiments at work. I wonder if the red bandanas were a nod to communism.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This was an extension of that. Unionist coal miners didn’t have red necks (because they work under ground) so they would wear red handkerchiefs to show solidarity with farm hands.

      This is the history that capitalist removed from history books. That and white washing The Black Panthers, American Indian Movement and The Rainbow coalition.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wiki says:

      A citation from 1893 provides a definition as “poorer inhabitants of the rural districts … men who work in the field, as a matter of course, generally have their skin stained red and burnt by the sun, and especially is this true of the back of their necks”.[12] … By 1900, “rednecks” was in common use to designate the political factions inside the Democratic Party comprising poor white farmers in the South.[14]

      Coal miners

      The term “redneck” in the early 20th century was occasionally used in reference to American coal miner union members who wore red bandanas for solidarity.

      Looks like sunburn predates coal miners.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean to have an actual citation from 1893 that provides a written out definition is huge. These things are around for a good bit before making their way into documentation.

          Reading through the talk, many people say coal and then provide links that come far after 1893.

          • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The Wikipedia article doesn’t link to a 1893 citation. It links for a single paywalled article to make that claim. This sounds like an urban legend loop that seems to make sense until examined.

  • JPAKx4
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why are people gatekeeping today’s 10,000?

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Medical organizations such as the American Cancer Society recommend the use of sunscreen because it aids in the prevention of squamous cell carcinomas.

      Sunscreen good

      As of 2021, only zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since there is currently insufficient data to support recognizing petrochemical UV filters as safe.

      Okay, mineral sunscreen good

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ironically, this was played for the Class of 98 at our Senior Prom and the lyric for the song was Class of 97, the version from the album before they re-released it for that money grab with Class of 99.

        The song was just a retelling of the original ‘Wear Sunscreen’ written by Mary Schmich, a columnist for the Chicago Tribune in 1997.

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    And I thought a “trucker’s tan” was the window-side arm of someone who drives a lot. Anyhoo, congratulations on being one of the 10,000, amigo!

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought it was from union miners wearing red bandanas during fights against Pinkertons

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      They took a negative and turned it into a rallying cry.

      Same as with “Yankee Doodle.” Yankee was a derogatory term for Americans, because many were of Dutch origin. “Jan” was a popular Dutch name. Doodle mean, well doo-doo.

      Funny how some derogatory terms get embraced and others don’t.

      Nerd used to be a big insult. So was ‘porn.’

  • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I remember in school people would say something loudly- neck check? or redneck check? I’m really not sure- and then slap you on the back of the neck. The assumption was that if you had a sunburned neck it’d hurt. I can’t remember why the hell it was done, just that it was.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    That doesn’t make sense, you get sun burn like that if you go from no sun exposure to lots of sun exposure. People working in the fields would not have been constantly sun burned unless they were albino.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tell me you’ve never worked on a farm without telling me that you’ve never worked on a farm.

      The thumbnail photo is extreme, yes. But white farm workers still get sunburns.

        • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Modern farming isn’t really comparable to folks working the land 100+ years ago. My point is that farmers 100 years ago weren’t stupid, they would have protected themselves when necessary and would have earned an impressive base tan.

          • folkrav@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t think it’s a particularly far fetched idea to imagine that people spending their days outside before the invention of sunscreen would develop more sunburns than the general population regardless, even if only once or twice a year on unexpectedly long or sunny days…

            • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It doesn’t seem far fetched which is what makes this urban myth appealing. But this red neck theory makes loads of assumptions, like these farmers didn’t know how to protect themselves from the sun, these farmers were groomed in a way to reveal their necks, etc. In reality, they would have had solid base tans, worn hats, and probably kept their neck and ears covered with hair.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I am British by decent and lived on a boat for a year. First few months I was burned a few times but after a short while I was fine. Even when I was in places like the Bahamas. That was the same for all the other white folks, only the tourists were sunburned.

  • northendtrooper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I read somewhere that the red neck part came from the red clay/dirt in the south. Where the backwoodsman usually had their neck covered by the dust. Hence redneck.