• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 months ago

    She has zero interest in the gig and, other than being first lady, has absolutely zero qualifications… but then… neither did Trump.

    Whatever happened to the “Draft Oprah” movement?

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fuck Oprah. She’s an out of touch Billionaire who’s commitment to junk science set Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil loose on the world and gave Jenny McArthy a platform for her anti-vax autism bullshit. She’s absolutely not who we want running for president.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      She’s far more qualified than Trump but according to her husband’s book she didn’t even want to be First Lady. And as much as I don’t hold what I view as Barry’s presidential shortcomings against her, we have had far too many political family dynasty’s in this country. Let’s not have another

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah she is definitely way more qualified than trump is. He’s not qualified to do shit except cause problems for anyone for personal profit. I wouldn’t trust him with any fucking job let alone being president.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Eisenhower had a decorated military history, excellent for commander in chief. As did Grant.

            Hoover and Orange man? Well, you saw how THEY turned out.

            • enbyecho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Eisenhower had a decorated military history, excellent for commander in chief. As did Grant.

              That wasn’t the question.

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You know she’s a lawyer right? That’s already more credentials than Regan and Bush (being Governor of Texas doesn’t count)

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      While I do not believe she ahoukd run, unlike Trump, she is qualified. She has degrees from Princeton and Harvard and is an attorney. And more importantly, she is wicked smart.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    Please stop dragging her into this.

    She’d never want to be President. I’d argue we wouldn’t like her very much if she was the kind of person that did.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      She’d never want to be President.

      Paraphrasing Douglas Adams, that would make her the best candidate. But in real life, perhaps not so much.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m also wary of any poll that shows such a strong showing for Kamala Harris. Not saying it’s wrong, it legitimately looks like it’s got a lot of good data, but every other poll I’ve seen has been fairly unfavorable to the idea of her running against Trump.

      • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well it does seem that more people would vote for trump against her as well as more people vote for her. So maybe it’s legit?

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah this just looks like a name recognition poll. Kamala’s chances of beating trump aren’t any better than Biden’s.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In polling there’s a piece of wisdom that journalists don’t listen to. Ignore the outlier polls. If there’s multiple polls saying one thing and one poll saying something else then there’s far more likely to be something wrong with the one outlier. But clickbait machine goes brrrrt.

    https://am11.mediaite.com/med/cnt/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-02-at-5.06.44-PM.jpg

    Okay looks like Clickbait Machine goes brrrt for a different reason here. The upshot is that many respondents skipped the follow on questions. So assuming any amount of campaigning is competently done then the 12% Don’t know/skip category is likely to shrink closer to the 4% of the Biden-Trump match up. Then you can see that 40% of the respondents just answered Trump no matter what. In fact the Democrats percentage goes down nearly in lockstep with, Don’t Know/Skipped. So, in my opinion, there’s a really good chance the Democrats could actually pick up most of that column for Beshear or Pritzker.