• Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It could be a tool used for that discussion. Assign everyone both versions. Then discuss the ways the simplified version falls short of the original (and, because teens rebel, the ways it’s better) so that by the time you’re done, the kids who struggled to read the original will get more than the easy one could give them (and have really bad errors repaired) while the easy readers will have honed the ability to break down complex concepts. The middle kids will get a bit of both. And there’s bound to be examples of the way words change meaning over time.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sounds to me like it will get a lot of kids reading only the easy version even if they’re capable of more. You’re basically giving them the cliffnotes.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, I did, I’m just saying that unless you have a class of diligent students (in which case good on ya,) a good chunk of them will choose to ignore it and just read the easy version. It’s hard enough to get kids to read what’s assigned, it’ll be harder to get them to read two versions of the same thing.