• kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Despite some of the stupif shit like explaining why his name is Solo I liked the han solo movie too

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, if it was a sci-fi heist movie that was unrelated to Star Wars, I think people would have liked it a lot.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I really do wonder what might have been if it released before, rather than after, The Last Jedi. I only ended up seeing it because I got to go to a free screening with the new chewie, and it was a fun movie. I think at least on par with the prequels, but certainly more felt more “star wars” then the Sequels.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Couldn’t disagree more. You’d miss out on such bangers as “Congratulations, you are being rescued. Please do not resist.”

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fun fact; in the scene where K2SO slaps Cassian while pretending he’s a prisoner, Alan ad-libbed the “And there’s a fresh one…” line, and Diego Luna immediately cracked the fuck up during the take, but being a total pro he manages to (almost) hide it behind his hand while pretending he’s holding his face. Alan’s delivery was so good that they kept the take.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Witty one liners are all well and good, but they don’t exactly make for a well paced or interesting story.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Rogue One is how you do two acts of slow burn, followed by a third act that gives you payoff for your patience.

        The first season of Picard is exactly how not to do that.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Slow burn is great when you have strong character writing and world building. These are things of which Rogue One has virtually none.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        Andor is the kind of show where I would literally recommend it to someone who hates Star Wars. It’s just such an incredibly raw, powerful, and vital piece of media. One of the finest works of anti-fascist art I’ve seen in a long time.

        Anyone who hasn’t watched that show is robbing themselves. Moments like “one way out” and Luthen’s “sacrifice” monologue are going to live with me for a long time. Season 2 can’t come soon enough.

        Also B2EMO is the best droid in all of Star Wars (Fun fact; his voice is the puppeteer’s, but it wasn’t supposed to be. They were planning to overdub, but then the guy did such an amazing job on the set that they just gave him the role).

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Andor worked despite being Star Wars, not because of it. It very well could be even better for people who don’t like SW. Knowing how it fits into the larger universe is nice, but it isn’t required. It’s just a good anti-fascist freedom fighter story that happens to use Star Wars language and aesthetics.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’m not sure I fully agree there. I think it’s absolutely accurate to say that Andor didn’t need to be Star Wars. Like, you absolutely could file all the serial numbers off and get a show that works in more or less exactly the same way.

            With that said, I think Andor absolutely benefits from being Star Wars, in a couple of a ways.

            The first is that they can skip all the broad strokes world building. We don’t need the concept of the galactic empire explained to us, or the general structure of how the senate works, and so on. The big pieces are all in place, so they can get straight to the small scale world building instead. This would be a solvable problem if you were creating something new, but its definitely nice that they get to skip straight to the important bits this way.

            The second, bigger benefit (IMO) is the juxtaposition created by the tonal shift. Something that’s very notable about Star Wars is that the tone and the content are often rather at odds with each other. George Lucas is on record as saying that in his mind the Rebellion were the Viet-Cong (with the obvious implication that the Empire is the USA). That’s some fucking heavy shit. Luke’s adoptive parents get brutally murdered by agents of the state, for absolutely no crime at all, and this inspires him to take up with a group of, well, terrorists. I mean, this is literally the same as a young Palestinian joining up with Hamas. Star Wars is about some really, really heavy shit, but it also starts with the line “A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away…” This is a fairy-tale about magic space wizards, but also a story about insurgents blowing up a massive military installation, and eventually performing a coup and assassinating the head of state.

            Over the years, the story around Star Wars has leaned increasingly into the “magic space wizards” side of things. It’s seen as a family friendly property, something for kids to enjoy at Disneyland. The creators of Andor set out to intentionally shock the audience by creating something that leans hard away from that family friendly image. Andor is a fucking dark story, about desperate people adopting brutal methods in the face of brutal oppression.

            And they’re not just doing that for shock value. The point of this is to tell a story about the ways in which we idealise “rebels” in one breath and condemn “terrorists” in another. To many people, Luke is a hero, but that young man who joins up with Hamas is a monster. Reality is complicated and messy. Hamas are a real political group, with a real ideology, and despite the monstrous oppression they face, some of that ideology really sucks. Their targets aren’t “Storm Troopers”, they’re often civilians, or conscripts. On the other hand, many of those conscripts behave in ways far more monstrous than anything the empire is ever depicted as doing.

            Andor is a story about fascism, about the absolute necessity of resisting it, and about the monstrous personal cost that resistance can demand of us. By setting that story against the backdrop of a “family friendly” property I think it really does a lot to drive home the disconnect between our ideals of resistance and the cold, hard reality.

          • ReeferPirate@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s fucking jarring when the ISB name drop Palpatine. You completely forget it’s star wars at some points

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            anti-fascist freedom fighter story

            I mean that’s arguably what Star Wars is.

            The Prequels and Sequels each flubbed it in their own way by being either too meandering or too self-obsessed, but Andor is basically a forceless movie trilogy broken into episodes.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t know that you even have to know anything about Star Wars to enjoy Andor. It’s not like Star Wars lore was super important. The Force and Jedi are not even parts of the plot.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Andor is really slow art. It takes a while to build, but once you’re in, you’re hooked. Can’t wait for season 2, either. People were really concerned when Disney took over SW, and the modern movies are pretty mid (except Rogue One, which is amazing), however the series that have come out of their takeover have been mostly fantastic or at the very least just enjoyable. Andor and Mandalorian being the stars. Boba Fett was pretty disappointing though.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 months ago

    I liked a lot of seven, but knowing that you’d have to eventually watch nine sort of invalidates the rest of that trilogy

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      5 months ago

      Never did watch 9. My biggest problem with 7 ?and other reboots like Jurassic World) is it was literally almost a rehash of 4, except with an even bigger “Death Star”. Rather than going for a unique plot.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 months ago

        I thought they did really well on coming up with new characters, and original stories, I enjoyed most of their arcs and adventures in 7.

        The biggest death Star was the biggest letdown of that movie for sure.

        But hoo boy, after I watched nine, my irritation at the laziness of a bigger death Star is nearly insignificant compared to some of the plot points in 9.

        When I saw the starkiller I rolled my eyes, but I literally could have walked out during 9 from

        spoiler

        the knife and sith island

        I was already bummed out at eight that there was no Luke or character development for finn.

        Then all of nine was pretty bad but especially the idiotic plot device mentioned above and a couple other things ruined that trilogy for me and definitely tarnished my enthusiasm for 7

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Idk if original stories is something you can give it. The bigger death star is far from the only plot point lifted directly out of episode 4. Seriously, go back and watch ep 4 and ep 7 it’s almost shot-for-shot (not really but for some of the story beats it could be).

          Maybe what you’re saying is that the character back stories are original which, kinda.

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah. It didn’t seem like a complete waste watching 7. It felt completely redundant, but I enjoyed the Daniel Craig and Yayan Ruhian cameos, which pushed it into a mildly positive territory for me.

            What I don’t get is why would anyone watch 8, let alone 9 after that. Sounds like some variety of Stockholm Syndrome is at play here. I didn’t, and from what I heard it was a smart decision.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve heard that said, but I think a lot of the accusations of unoriginality between 4 and 7 are mostly because they have similar themes by virtue of belonging to the same series.

            “Ugh, John wick found another reluctant health professional to patch trim up after getting shot”.

            kind of thing.

            I think Star wars is pushing really hard to reboot Star wars entirely. 2, so they don’t want to do anything new so much as update some of the old stuff with their own characters so that the new movies take over the old ones like the new Canon is taking over the old Canon.

            • Donkter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Idk how you could reach that conclusion. Maybe you watched 7 and haven’t seen 4 in a while. It’s not just your John Wick example. The movie is pretty shameless about lifting the structure of 4, it’s not some subtle nuanced technicality.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Watched four through six before checking out 7.

                Do you have some examples that you’re talking about specifically besides mega death Star?

                It seemed pretty clear to me that Disney was trying to remimagine elements of four so that they could have a new series all to themselves, but the movie itself felt new in a lot of ways.

                Finn was a huge part of that, there was never a character like him before.

                They also didn’t have a Kenobi leading them through everything.

                It’s the Star wars universe so a lot of the themes and elements (spaceships, and overbearing government, manichean forces) are going to be similar, but you had new characters doing different things for different reasons in different situations for most of the movie.

        • BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Three is genuinely the best of the prequels by a pretty big margin (though it still suffers a bit from prequel-itis). Definitely with a watch though IMO.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        My reaction upon leaving the theater was “Wow! They did Star Wars almost better than Star Wars!”

        In the days that followed, the more I thought about the movie, the less I liked it in retrospect. I was hoping for a continuation of the saga, not “Star Wars: The Remake”.

    • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Force Awakens is pretty meh itself, but we were not prepared for what was coming. It feels as foreboding as rewatching Game of Thrones S5 or S6 and knowing that the deteriorating writing will only get worse.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m very glad I never got into the game of thrones TV show.

        I read the books, but I couldn’t even handle the first season of the TV show.

        Kind of feels the same way as never having joined titter and watching it circling the drain now.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I opted out of GoT after trying to watch S1 too. I could tell it just wasn’t my cup of tea.

          Then around season 5 the hype got so intense that I caved. Ended up binging seasons 1-5. And I have to say…even despite seasons 7 and 8 (and somewhat season 6) it was worth the watch. When it was good, it was really good.

          I do think that bingeing seasons 1-5 really highlighted how bad the writing had gotten even in season 6. I tried to warn my friends that the outlook was not good but I wasn’t able to convince them. Some of them wouldn’t even admit it until season 8. Some as late as the last handful of episodes. But they all eventually came around.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s good to hear. I have given it a second watch some years back, but couldn’t get through The first season again, but it was such a phenomenon I imagine I’ll try again at some point

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Game of thrones actually came out in 1996.

            The first five books were already written and published by the time the TV show started.

            The fifth one was published just a few months after that first season of the TV show.

            • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              They were being cheeky, cause the author is well into a decade+ writing the 2nd to last novel in the series.

              I think most people have accepted at least the final book will never happen, that dudes not living the healthiest life right now anyways.

                • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No dramas, I was being cheeky. I’ve also read the books. I was pleasantly surprised with how well the show portrayed the books (merging of some characters, but expected). Until a point…

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Okay. That’s a huge part of the show though.

            I am glad so many people are still defending it, there must be something to it

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The more I’ve watched GoT the more I wish they’d have adapted Kharkanas instead. I know the third book isn’t out yet but that didn’t seem to stop GoT.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      8 really ruined it. 7 had problems but I could forgive some of them because “Disney still trying to figure it out.”

      Then 8 happened. Closed off all story threads from 7 without any fanfare at all, and closed off all of its own potential threads within itself, leaving absolutely nothing for 9 to follow up on. Multiple character assassinations, and the entire Canto section could be deleted from the film and zero context would be lost.

      9 was never going to succeed. It couldn’t have. There was nothing for it to build on from 8.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        5 months ago

        What story threads? There were no story threads. There was hopeful fans who wanted to create things out of thin air. That’s about it. There was more from 8 to lead off from than 7.

        • Jyrdano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          8 gets a lot of hate along with the rest of the sequels, and I remember being pissed off of its scorched earth treatment of every single plot point from 7 after watching it in the movie theatre, but looking back… at least it tried to be original. The scenes are visually memorable, and its message that even nobody can rise up to be a hero, is miles better than… whatever the 9 did with Rey.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        7 put Luke hiding on an island while a war was going on and left 8 to take the flak for explaining why. There was no way to make 8 without pissing people off.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Then I don’t understand. 8 developed Poe further by exploring the character arc for the daring overconfident pilot. Finn was given a reason to fight for the rebellion instead of trying to run away with Rey every 5 minutes. We got some absolutely great character development with Rey having a natural inclination to the dark side which builds on the fact she used the dark side to defeat Kylo in 7, and we use her as a lens to explore the “born special” trope in Star Wars, getting into more of her past history and getting satisfying answers.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you think 7 is good you are a hopeless movie watcher, it set up nothing just typical jj abrams mystery boxes, is a straight up rehashing of A new hope and it did nothing of note. 8 tried to deviate from another shadowy mysterious bad guy aka Wish.com palpatine and do something different and it did it well.

        And then 9 is a straight up piece of shit the only good part of it is the first montage with Kylo Ten being the boss and fucking shit up, they really dropped the ball by backpedaling from 8

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I didn’t say 7 was good, only that I was willing to be more forgiving since it was Disney’s first Star Wars film.

          8 did nothing well but destroy Star Wars at every turn. I would say because of what it did, I consider 9 to be better than 8. 9 could never have been good, and that is completely the fault of 8.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            9 is a flaming piece of shit on every level. I think its even insulting to call it a movie given how fucking shit it is.

            How can you say that 9 is better than 8 because 8 destoryed stuff (what exactly?) Meanwhile 9 literally destroys the whole OT and PT story arc of Anakin/Vader

            • hakase@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m just here to second the opinion that, while 7 was uninteresting, 8 basically destroyed Star Wars as a franchise, and that as imperfect as 9 is, it’s practically a miracle that it was as good as it was with what it had to follow.

              • kameecoding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Episode 9 was the worst thing in existence, well would have been if not for Season 8 of GoT.

                They had a proper face-off of who can make the worst fucking thing in existence

      • Cosmos7349@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh… soooooo say i’ve seen 8, but never got around to seeing 9… I should just chill and consider it done?

        • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I hadn’t seen 9 for the longest time and just read online how stupid it was. Then I watched it with that expectation and yes, totally confirmed. If anything you might want to watch it to see what a dumpster fire it is. But don’t prioritize it over other stuff you want to watch.

          • ditty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Except 9 isn’t “so bad it’s good,” it’s just bad. I would not recommend anyone watch episodes 7-9 at all.

              • ditty@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yup I was just chiming in to clarify for any other Lemmy users who could have gotten the wrong impression. Episode 9 is a dumpster fire with no redeeming qualities and should be avoided at all costs

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      A pity they already had the entire EU to work from and decided to obliterate it all… until they fucked up their own shit so badly they started bringing it back.

      We could have had another trilogy centered around an established strong female character.

      Mara Jade.

      Sure, mix and match in some new ideas to make it work better as films than novels. The idea of Finn (a defecting stormtrooper) absolutely works in this setting.

      But the original cast is too old for that time period!

      Well we’ve now seen that Luke can be portrayed reasonably well with another actor and face and voice changing tech.

      Have a whole trilogy set in basically the Mando/Asoka time period, but use the Mandalorians in a more adult story about the difficulty of establishing and maintaining alliances when the New Republic is young, the Imperial Remnant still exists, and now basically its chaos as various factions are picking sides.

      Thrawn can be the big bad, but his presence is barely hinted at in 7, makes his appearance in 8 and has a major victory, and is defeated in 9.

      You could even work in Boba Fett and Asoka! Maybe Thrawn sends Fett to assassinate Luke in 8 and he is seriously wounded or his new gaggle of Jedi trainees are fucked up, but Asoka helps Luke fend him off on the Millennium Falcon!

      But uh nope, instead we got A New Hope v2, A B and C plot clusterfuck with a side of break hyperspace and all space combat lore, followed by Duct Tape and Bullshit.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Rogue One blew my mind. Absolutely loved it.

      I know it’s probably an unpopular opinion but I liked Solo too. The parts I didn’t enjoy were the callbacks and stuff. I didn’t need to see all those, but I watched it twice and didn’t regret it.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There are eight movies and no sequel trilogy:

      Last Turn To The Dark Side (prequel single movie cut)
      Kenobi (Patterson Cut)
      Rogue One
      New Hope
      Holiday Special
      Lego Holiday Special
      ESB
      ROTJ

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    the local theater (we had one in our town) kept star wars playing (and only star wars) for a year. it wasn’t until around grease and jaws2 that they played anything else.

    same thing happened for the other two films of what became the original trilogy.

    basically turned me off to the whole ‘franchise’. all the films star wars kept from me as a small town kid by being on eternal repeat in the only theater accessible to me at the time.

    i did see the original first three films–one time each, the first week of their initial runs.

    but none since.

  • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Star Wars (no, it wasn’t “EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE”), Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi were the only good SW movies. The rest are embarrassingly bad fanfiction. Just because people laugh at the prequel memes doesn’t make the prequels good. We as a society fell when we started laughing at all the horrible parts of the prequels and then asked ourselves “wait, if we’re being entertained by the prequels, does that mean they were good?” and coming to the absolute wrong conclusion.

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think technology is the issue. When they made Star Wars, Empire, and Return the special effects tech was garbage (clunky, expensive, and time consuming) so they had to rely on good story telling and practical effects, as the special effects tech has gotten better the story telling seems to rely on the tech as opposed to overcoming the tech (this is all movies/shows not just this franchise). Iirc the death star was a bunch of models of battle ships and other things pasted together, not sure if they did fly-by-wire (Red Dwarf was really good at this practical effect) for the space battles. As an aside, we also tend to like the ones we grew up watching, I’m in the original trilogy is the best (pushin 50), but to those that were my age for the prequels think the prequels are the better series, not sure about the sequels.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are you kidding? Star Wars had amazing special effects for its day. Yeah, they look clunky now. But you know what? The special effects in Wizard of Oz looked clunky in the 1970s.

        As for good story telling…what? This is Star Wars we’re talking about, not Fine Art. It’s pretty much a reshooting of The Hidden Fortress … in space!

        It’s a fun movie, but damn do people lionize it far beyond what it ever actually was.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        When they made Star Wars, Empire, and Return the special effects tech was garbage (clunky, expensive, and time consuming) so they had to rely on good story telling and practical effects

        I’m curious, have you watched the original trilogy with the original practical effects, and not the crappy CGI that George added later?

        • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok, I am being misunderstood. The “practical effects” were amazing by the standards of the day, and are now basically a thing of the past. The ingenuity was second to none, but the light sabers, blaster bolts etc “special effects” were not the best. And yes I did see that atrocity and hate that I can’t find copies without the added crap. If George had waited another 5 or 10 years it could have been better. My main point, and it goes beyond star wars, is much of cinema and TV rely on CGI special effects and the writers hope that will get them over the line.

          Clunky = takes a lot of space, expensive = self explanatory, time consuming = getting models to behave properly

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ah, thanks for clarifying. That’s an interesting position. I never found the light sabers or blaster bolts in the original trilogy to look that bad. And the practical effects, models, and sets, certainly look superior to the CGI sets in the prequels.

            If George had waited another 5 or 10 years it could have been better.

            I’m not so sure about this. I think that the limitations George had at the time ended up being part of what made the original trilogy so good. If George had access to better special effects, would we still have gotten scenes like these?

            spoiler

            Or would we have gotten this instead?

            spoiler

            George being able to do “whatever he wants” does not necessarily lead to the best movie.

            and hate that I can’t find copies without the added crap

            Search up “Harmy despecialized” and “4k77”. There are many other Star Wars fans who feel the way you do, and they have taken matters into their own hands :)

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a multibillion dollar franchise. How exactly is it overrated? Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s over rated.

        • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          No I’m not. You are confusing your own tastes with what is generally considered “good”.

          The original trilogy is solid. Those films are 40+ years old. Obviously they don’t compare to anything you’ll see now.

            • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Im still waiting on someone to tell me how the original trilogy is over rated. Sounds like the movie didn’t have enough flashing lights and loud noises your y’all.

              The originals have an avg rating of 8.5 and an avg rotten tomatoes score of 90. Not only are they incredibly popular but they continued to be well scored by people that have never seen them.

              Again please explain how they are over rated.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t think they are over rated, I’m just saying this defensive mentality is strange. Let them think it’s overrated. It shouldn’t detract from your joy.

              • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Again please explain how they are over rated.

                If I say “x is overrated” it’s a statement of my opinion relative to the average rating of x. That’s literally what the sentence means. Stating the average rating of x doesn’t disprove anything. You’re not even engaging with the idea lol. And there’s little reason to since it’s literally just someone’s opinion relative to the mainstream.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Facebook comic

    Makes sense. Those people are ancient. The 6 movies are fine it is the crap Disney stuff that sucks. Apparently I am a “bad” Star Wars fan if I don’t subscribe to DRM based streaming where you own nothing. Also the idea that there is a story line after the end is dumb and poorly done.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        They are definitely more of an appeal to pathos. Unlike the sequels the prequels go from good to evil. It is a sad story plays out that ultimately leads into the sequels.

        • USSMojave@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          I feel like people don’t give 3 enough credit for really going there with the tragic ending, fully committing to having everything go to shit to set up the original trilogy

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        They are, the dialogue is absolutely horrendous. There is a reason is has been memed to death.

        That said young kids enjoy it. Sabers go wonwon, blasters go pew pew. And watch them go crazy for that pod race scene.

        • Aa!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          This is exactly why I roll my eyes at the people who are rabidly angry at the sequel trilogy. We’ve seen all this happen before, and it turns out no matter how bad we think it is, there’s still a group that gets something special out of it. It wasn’t cool for me to take the prequels so seriously and hate on them while a whole new generation of Star Wars fans were just getting into it. At the time, the kids loved Jar-Jar!

          I’m not fond of the sequel trilogy. But I honestly think episode 8 was the best of the lot. And if there’s people who like what these movies are, then that’s a good thing for them

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d rather kids watch smart movies like The Iron Giant but it’s hard to argue Star Wars has a lot of cool stuff kids will enjoy immensely.

            Yeah the prequels have horrible dialogue, bad direction (making a mostly fantastic cast look bad) and many questionable choices. I couldn’t rewatch most of it myself but hating them is a bit strong especially if somebody else is getting harmless enjoyment of it.

        • AngryMob@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you think the dialogue and such in the original trilogy is so much better than you must be blinded by nostalgia. The cheesy dialogue is present in all 6 movies, and so is the childishness. A certain amount of that george lucas cringe is actually necessary imo.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah, we’ve been rewatching the OG trilogy and it isn’t fantastic but some of the actors manage to deliver the cheesy dialogue with some confidence.

            People quote Han Solo and not in the Star Wars meme way. And I’ll pick the Han/Leia hate-flirt any day of the week over the Anakin/Padme creepmantic dialogue.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          They are, the dialogue is absolutely horrendous.

          “I wish I could wish away my feelings”

          “I’ve been dying a little bit each day since you came back into my life”

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can get chill and watch 5 of the 6. I refuse the jar jar movie. I heard his goddamn patois one time in theaters and it was more than enough.

        I like the alternate order which mixes the two trilogies together: ep 4,5,2,3,6. No ep 1! boooooo!

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Good, laws are shit anyway. Especially copyright laws.

          I guess if you don’t want it that’s fair. It is though the best way to obtain things like the hogwarts game where we don’t want to give money to the author. Not that that is my sort of game, but I have obtained copies for other people.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        RotJ is where Lucas started to not have pushback on story ideas. It still mostly works but some silliness is leaking through. Especially in the Special Edition, but Empire is the only one that really wasn’t effected by those.

        • ___f____g___@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          100% agree! RotJ is where the cracks started to show. I think people forget this because all the nonsense that followed, starting with the Special Editions, makes RotJ seem restrained in comparison.

        • Brutticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I honestly cannot believe you forgot about the Skywalker twins.

          “I’ve always known.”

          Somehow.

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Still not as stupid as George’s decision to have Leia remember their mother as “beautiful but sad” and then have Padme die two minutes after Leia is born. Like, damn, Leia’s got a good memory.

            • Brutticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I would be generous and interpret that as Leah remembering Bail Organa’s wife (who it must remembered, she thought was her mother until like, an hour before that conversation), or else constructing memories of an ideal woman.

              At least, until Obi Wan, but whatever

              Your point still stands. She only found out she was adopted like an hour prior.

              • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                She only found out she was adopted like an hour prior.

                Wait, who did she find this out from? Her adoptive parents were presumably killed in Star Wars with the destruction of Alderaan.

                It’s also implied that she knew she was adopted. Luke asks her “do you remember your mother, your real mother?” and Leia replies “Just a little bit. She died when I was very young”.

      • SlothMama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve always believed that the Star Wars universe needs a faction that is cognizant that the cycle of Jedi / Sith is irrational fanaticism of ideology and the force is ideologically neutral.

        I have always believed the force is always meant not to be balanced via organization, but balanced per person, that the truth is light side and dark side are just concepts and bad conclusions based on centuries of orthodoxy.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I kept thinking they’d go there, and they still haven’t.

          The Jedi sense of balance isn’t balanced at all.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bilbo Bagshot : What about the Ewoks? They were rubbish! You don’t complain about them!

        Tim : Yeah, but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft!

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      yeah, glad that these sequel fuckers didn’t think about mad max or the terminator either. there can be only one.

        • oo1@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s my pile of sand, and I’m keeping my head deep down within it. Now “temple of doom”, that was going too far. And dont get me started on the godfather