• lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    they can encrypt the data and bundle it with other requests. regardless, is it really easier to 24/7 monitor your web traffic than to just use a computer/phone instead of a voice assistant ?

    • offspec@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Encrypted doesn’t mean magically violating the laws of physics, data uses bandwidth. There’s no reason for these devices to be using the amount of bandwidth it would take to make what you’re implying even close to feasible.

      • lseif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        text transcriptions take up barely any bandwith, i guarantee u wouldnt notice it

        • offspec@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes because security researchers and hobbyists would never compare an isolated device to one plugged in next to a TV or in a crowded room, there just isn’t any data to support that anything like that is happening. As many other commenters have said, these devices are less complex than a cell phone and most people have no issues carrying one of those around. If one of your devices was “tapped” it would be that one.

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Most text transcript services are too complex to run on the tiny little processor in these devices. They would be sending audio or nothing at all