Vladimir Putin has demanded that Kyiv cede more land, withdraw troops deeper inside its own country, and drop its Nato bid in order for him to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Putin’s fresh ceasefire demands were issued as envoys from more than 90 countries, including Ukraine, convene in Switzerland this weekend to discuss a western-led peace plan. Russia is not invited to the conference and the president’s remarks on Friday were likely to have been timed as a spoiler to that summit.

Speaking with diplomats at the Russian foreign ministry, Putin publicly updated his terms for ending the war in Ukraine for the first time since he launched a full-scale invasion in February 2022, when he demanded regime change in Kyiv and the country’s “demilitarisation”.

The US defence secretary, Lloyd Austin, said Putin was in “no position” to make demands on Ukraine and could end the war he had started “today if he chose to do that.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    5 months ago

    I know a very easy way for the war to end right now, Vlad.

    You order your troops to leave Ukraine.

    War over.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      He most likely achieves internal goals through external means

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    The best way to stop that war is to bring Putin in front of the ICC for his war crimes.

      • ralphio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        This seems to imply that there aren’t already ICC warrants for Putin. There are…

        • mindlight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          No. That’s not what I wrote. To try to get it to that you’d have to perform quite some acrobatics to be able to leave out “South Africa” from the picture.

          South Africa requested not to have to arrest Putin last year. War crimes in Ukraine not the top priority for South Africa then but it seems like they changed their mind about war crimes since last October. Well, not regarding war crimes in Ukraine it seems though…

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        As far as I can tell, that’s de rigeur for these now. It’s largely the same on both sides in the other war too.

        I think international pressure needs to be brought to bear. I can appreciate that the end of the war will likely require unpopular concessions. But I think humanitarian concerns as well as the need to halt the advance of authoritarian nationalism around the world requires an end to the two big wars.

        If we can’t find an end, the US should withdraw from both. Our role is prolonging them.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          5 months ago

          Can I come to your house and start taking your things and say you’re prolonging the suffering if you try to stop me, and we should just stop and go our separate ways (after I take a few more things)?

          • Andy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t really get how this analogy is useful. I’m not of the opinion that anything Russia is doing is justifiable or just.

            Putin’s was of aggression is very bad. We agree on that.

        • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lots of passive voice here. Ukraine is fighting off an existential threat from a historically genocidal state. All Putin has to do is stop issuing orders and the war ends right this second.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    So if the same applies to Russia Putin is okay with a foreign country invading Russia based on lies, capturing territory, targeting and murdering civilians and kidnapping children, violating treaties, and they would accept a ceasefire with the invader keeping everything they currently hold to regroup for another assault? Get the fuck out of here

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      If he actually did this from a position of power, one might understand this. But in the here and now, it is totally ridiculous.

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    What’s new about it? His demands always were “Give me everything I want or I will take it by force”

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Guess the new part is he pinky swears they can keep the Western half of Ukraine. As long as they don’t form alliances and agree to weaken the military protecting the Western half…

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    “You give up, do as I say and I take everything” is not a peace negotiation. Its a renewal of his declaration of war.

  • Jin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s like a house squatter demanding the house owner to leave to end the conflict.

    Putin, just leave…

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hey here’s an idea: instead of telling Putin to end the war himself, how bout if NATO DOES THE ONE FUCKING JOB IT WAS CREATED TO DO?

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      5 months ago

      You realize that Nato is a defense alliance, dedicated to protecting other member states. Ukraine is NOT a member of Nato. And cannot currently join Nato, because only a country not at war can join.

      It has been said that the literal minute this war ends, Ukraines application is all but already passed. But that can’t happen until they end the war. Which means either Putin loses, and goes home, Putin takes all of Ukraine 100% defeated and absorbed into russia, or Ukraine wins the war on their terms.

      Until then, Nato is mostly bound to stay out of foreign affairs by their own mission statement

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      NATO is a defensive pact, not a global army. Its job is to keep its member countries safe and peaceful. NATO will not attack Russia unless Russia does so first by attacking a NATO country. Ukraine is currently not in NATO (though they wish to be) and as such NATO will not be involved. The individual countries, of course, can help support Ukraine but that’s about it.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 months ago

        Protect a member nation from invasion. So I’m not sure how they can help in this instance.

        They’re doing the best they can with the little amount of rope they have.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    In that case I will freshly issue a demand for Putin to surrender to Ukrainian forces step down and face trial for war crimes.