I can’t say I’ve been using Lemmy for long, but from the get-go it seems that the communities, memes, opinions that get upvoted seem to reflect left-wing ideas.

I’m certainly not complaining, it honestly feels like a breathe of fresh air compared to other social media sites that seem to shift further and further to the far right, though I am curious to hear why this might be the case? Does FOSS tend to attract more left-wing minded people, or does this just happen to be a broadly left-wing microcosm/bubble?

Hope you all have a great day.

  • chumbalumber
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    295
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The philosophy behind FOSS is inherently left wing and anarchist; communities working together to provide and produce tools for the common good, without a profit motive. Coupled with the lack of advertising and promotion of the sites, people have to seek them out, leading to a self-selecting user population that skews left :)

    • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      131
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would say that FOSS typically draws a more educated crowd, and right wing rhetoric and propaganda typically target those of lesser education and lower cognitive ability, simply because those people are the most likely hosts for rightoid brain worms. Why do colleges skew heavily left, gee it must be brainwashing /s

      • chumbalumber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        86
        ·
        6 months ago

        Eh, there’s plenty of educated right wingers. Not fascists as much, but the kind of fiscally conservative economists who preach austerity are often as not highly educated, just lacking in empathy.

        • Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          70
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are definitely plenty of well educated, intelligent fascists as well. It’s pretty dangerous to start thinking that what separates two ideological groups is intelligence.

            • Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 months ago

              I was mainly responding to the previous comment which characterized right-wingers as having “lesser cognitive ability”. Just saying that that kind of thinking sets up a “we’re superior” mentality that can too easily lead to the same kinds of consequences as thinking you’re superior based on race or social status. There are so many environmental and experiential factors that go into where a person lands politically and how effective certain forms of propaganda are on them. Blanket statements that characterize entire people groups as less intelligent are not in any way accurate or helpful.

              • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Just saying that that kind of thinking sets up a “we’re superior” mentality that can too easily lead to the same kinds of consequences as thinking you’re superior based on race or social status.

                It already does, it’s called ableism and it has such deep roots in society it is everywhere no matter political leaning, which is why it is rarely addressed - because most of society still sees it as perfectly acceptable that disabled people are inferior (even though ableism impacts them too, not just because accessibility and inclusion benefit everyone, but because people just don’t like to think about getting hit by a car, having a stroke, or just growing old, nor about their child being born neurodivergent for example).

                • Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think what you said is true. But you’re referring to people who have an actual handicap and are discriminated against for it.

                  What I’m referring to is the idea of allowing myself to believe that a people group are less intelligent than I am just because they don’t align with me politically or ideologically. There is no actual handicap for which they are being discriminated against, simply having a different life experience and different view point is enough. It’s ironically a deeply fascist mentality…and I agree it is everywhere.

                  • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    What I’m referring to is the idea of allowing myself to believe that a people group are less intelligent than I am just because they don’t align with me politically or ideologically. There is no actual handicap for which they are being discriminated against

                    They might not have a disability, but using intelligence based insults isn’t ableist because of that, just like calling someone “gay” as an insult isn’t problematic because the person they’re trying to insult isn’t actually gay, but because it frames being gay as a negative term and something worthy of derision and mockery.

        • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re speaking of pundits and politicians whose opinions are public and widespread. There is little reason to believe that those folks are sincere in their public statements. They are motivated by greed to lie in an effort to sway the opinions of uneducated people.

          Among the general public, those that sincerely hold conservative political views are cognitively impaired. Source: they vote for things that are objectively against their own prosperity.

        • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The educated and the well-travelled may have a broader set of view points to see how many different ideas and values work (or don’t work) in practice.

          I don’t disagree on some just lacking empathy. But I also think not all education creates exposure to a wide range of ideas and values that stick (or the education is just too narrow), so you’ll still find plenty of people who are educated on paper, but not cognizant of a broad set of world views. I also think we are too quick to label foreign ideas==bad ourselves. Empathy is a two way street. The key in navigating this may be in identifying when an idea comes in good faith or if it is hostile.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think pretty much everyone views their political ideology as “the one that stands for freedom”, and it just comes down to what it means to be “free”, and the follow up of free from what.

      I feel like libertarians would love the concept of FOSS and decentralization, and I don’t think anyone would argue they skew left.

      So, I disagree that FOSS is inherently left wing. I think it’s attractive to the left wing for many good reasons. I think people project their own politics onto whatever they love, and things can be loved by very different groups for different reasons.

      • yiliu@informis.land
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I feel like libertarians would love the concept of FOSS and decentralization, and I don’t think anyone would argue they skew left.

        Yup, there has always been a large libertarian contingent in the OSS community.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a left winger myself…

      … I’m not sure Foss is inherently left wing. Inherently anti authoritarian for sure, but I can totally see a libertarian type making a pro-FOSS argument from a capitalistic-individualistic and it being rather sensible. (Aaaaas long as we ignore the ways it’d contradict other beliefs right wing liberals tend to hold, but yknow. Compartmentalisation is a human superpower)

      • chumbalumber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think I’d still argue the free open source part is inherently left wing. Why would I, a right wing libertarian, lend my time to developing a piece of software that I am unable to make a profit from? I have no motive.

        Something like bitcoin is the kind of tech project of that mould that i think attracts the right wing libertarian. Just my opinion though.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Why would I, a right wing libertarian, lend my time to developing a piece of software that I am unable to make a profit from? I have no motive.

          Because you do stand to gain regardless. “I have my code on the source of <major FOSS project every tech guy has heard of>” is like. Amazing portfolio material for any job interview. I had a friend get a job in the games industry (though they regret it to this day because the game industry sucks–) with nothing on his resumé except for a smattering of mods for popular games.

          Any pro-capitalist person with a functioning brain will acknowledge the role of non-monetary “Profits” in every human relationship, yanno?

          • aleph@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s true, but it still doesn’t change the fact that the FOSS ethos runs in direct conflict with the ideals of capitalism and private ownership, and libertarians are nothing if not fanboys of those things.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah. It’s long been said Libertarians are just Republicans that want to smoke weed and distance themselves from the outwardly racist rhetoric. They are inherently selfish just like Republicans. They don’t want to help the poor, but they would balk at the notion of actively hurting the poor.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            and distance themselves from the outwardly racist rhetoric.

            The ones I met were even more racist. They were just afraid of saying it in public because they thought the feds were watching them, and wished they didn’t have to live with that fear.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bitcoin is open source too. And I guess there’s a history of libertarians getting involved in projects like Linux as well (ESR comes to mind).

          Still, I’d wager most are attracted to FOSS are left wing. A lot of capitalists can’t comprehend giving something for free to the community.

        • darthelmet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah. I don’t know what the % breakdown is, but I get the sense that while the general community is inherently anti-corporate/anti-commodification, there are some that view this in the left wing sense of communities supporting each other and some who view this more of as a consumption/voting with your wallet individualized choice. They recognize that some or even all corporations are bad, but think opting out of those structures without directly challenging them is all that they need.

          But like I said, idk what the actual distribution of these views are. It’s just the sense I get from seeing some of the comments.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Profit isn’t the only individual motivator. Power is another big one, even if it is power over a very small fiefdom. At a certain point that’s all money is: a way to keep track of how much power you have. That’s why they keep going for the high score.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      FOSS isn’t inherently left wing. It is often charitable work but that’s far from unique to the left wing. That can also just stem from “I wanted this program to exist and it didn’t, but I don’t want to put even more effort in to monetize it.” Plenty of FOSS projects start as someone wanting to learn something early on in their career as well (which is both a pro and a con because … if you’re learning you might be making some bigger mistakes).

      Anarchism … I just don’t really agree with that at all. Lots of larger FOSS projects do very much have governing bodies that decide what to do and how it shall be done. In many cases FOSS authors are a one person governing body making all the big decisions.

      Organized charitable work is far from anarchy even though anarchism dreams of everything being organized charitable work.