• Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because it was built at the thinnest part of the content and used existing lakes?

      Pretty sure Omaha would have loved an East\West canal across the continent.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          But it was done, which is kind of the opposite of NIMBY. Also it’s not a project that could go anywhere, except that no one wants it.

          Closing Guantanamo was a NIMBY thing because, while everyone agrees it should happen, no one wanted the detainees in their backyard. (As ridiculous as that is.)

          • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            The Panama canal was a US NIMBY project I’d argue. Give us the canal but without impacting our territory.

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Your comment is actually insane.

              There is no way the US would not have preferred the canal to be in their backyard.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              We didn’t maintain administration of the canal for just over a century for no reason. We would have put that shit in the Rio Grande, if we could have. Unfortunately that river runs dry for several months a year.

              Especially since that particular area of the world is some of the least developed.