• Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t entirely true. Many states who have legalized Cannabis have expunged convictions off of people’s records automatically, or have created a process where an individual can request it.

      • Gormadt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically what the previous commentor and I are saying is that it has to be state level overturns or expungements unless the federal government can get legislation through because the federal government can’t force the states to do that without legislation.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see. That isn’t how I interpreted their comment, but I do agree with that assessment. Even if Cannabis was federally legalized I’m not sure that the federal government could force states to retroactively overturn convictions, but I am just making an assumption as that is beyond the scope of my legal knowledge.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. Unless it’s a federal indictment, the states need to clear it. There have been instances where Federal Regulations are wiped out (prohibited), but that is not the case here.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      And given our current situation in the House and Senate (not having enough to beat a Republican filabuster) I don’t see federal legislation happening anytime soon.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Senate (not having enough to beat a Republican filabuster)

        The Democrats’ caucus is large enough to do away with the filibuster forever. So naturally, it hasn’t.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can get them all to agree to get rid of it

          And that’s a big if

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since the party wants perfect lockstep from its voters, that if shouldn’t exist at all.