Lisa Lawler had no reason to suspect Const. Boris Borissov but now her opinion of police has changed — she’s convinced other grieving families have been victims of similar thefts

  • SoleInvictus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is and always has been one primary message, as noted above. The mainstream media, which benefits directly from sensational reporting and is owned by people who benefit from an authoritarian police force, likes to muddy the waters with misleading reporting and interviews like the one you linked, which are more extremist and not representative of the core motive.

    Critical thinking, folks. It’s important and never too late to learn. Ask important questions like “are these data representative? If not, why are they being presented to me? Who benefits from this misrepresentation? Which data are actually representative?”

    • Old_Geezer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Actually he’s a high profile activist and representative of the movement in Toronto. Many of the young people I’ve personally interacted with, seem to think likewise. As I’m a local man, what people believe locally takes precedence over any Wikipedia article or what Solinvictus believes is correct.

      • SoleInvictus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        When someone believes anecdotal evidence is representative of anything, you can be assured anything they say is of equal value.

        • Old_Geezer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          When someone believes anecdotal evidence is representative of anything, you can be assured anything they say is of equal value.

          Yes. Like Wikipedia. The video I linked too isn’t anecdotal. I live in the “Hood” and know what black youth think of the coppers and, especially when the movement to ‘Defund the Police’ started, what was the prevailing thought. The fact that someone wrote a Wikipedia article and stated their opinion of what it meant, is anecdotal in and of itself! 🤦‍♂️