“b-but bears are actually dangerous!” Shut the hell up.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s so tiring seeing the men coming in and deliberately misunderstanding what’s being discussed. They will do literally anything, appear dumb as rocks, to not recognize rape culture and admit potentially any fault or responsibility towards it’s continued existence. They take everything personally instead of being able to see that societal problems there are also responsible for helping to fix.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are we also going to tolerate the same with Islam and terrorism? POC and safety because “crime statistics”? If those are not acceptable because it’s not anyone’s individual responsibility for others in an involuntarily assigned group, why is this ok?

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not all men /s

      Your comment really hits the nail on the head, esp the dumb as rocks part. I think part of that stupidity is legitimately not being able to see past our own privilege.

      E: baha, downvote me harder, you nematodes

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah. I give some benefit of the doubt but after seeing plenty of varied and good explanations I’m tired of holding everyone’s hand who’s had plenty of chances to learn. After a while it just becomes men not listening and believing women which is too typical.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Here’s the problem with that statement. I agree that there is a problem with men committing rape. However, I (along with most men) have never raped anybody. Furthermore I have not done anything to perpetuate the actions of the minority of men who do commit sex crimes. Therefore I do NOT take responsibility or admit fault for their actions. Saying that men as a whole are the problem is offensive and unhelpful. It’s how random peaceful Muslims feel when conservatives tell them they need to take responsibility for the actions of terrorists and take action to stop terrorists “in their community” like all Muslims are in one big group chat. I would straight up give my life to prevent a woman I don’t know from being raped. Idk what more you want from me.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Your tiny bit of discomfort is clearly more important than rape culture that, yes you too, are contributing to. This is contribution to ignoring rape culture.

        Your willful ignorance and not listening to women is enabling rapists.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        the difference is that the patriarchy exists and favors men. there is no systematic structure that puts Muslims above others, at the expense of others, in a way that is parallel to what the patriarchy does.

        i get what you are saying, and maybe not too long ago i was professing quite similar feelings, but i encourage you to self interrogate how big of a difference that is. truly hope this is helpful.

        • Narauko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          So it is the level of “privilege” that does or does not allow the commission of -isms then. The better off the target is, the more acceptable discrimination is? That is also a very Western perspective. It would be ok to tell Muslims in the Middle East that terrorism is their responsibility because their country’s power structure does put Islam firmly above others?

          This “some animals are more equal than others” stuff is moral equivocating. If something is wrong if done to a group that isn’t “in power”, then it is also wrong to do it to the group “in power”. This isn’t a zero sum game. We don’t have to weight the guilt by association for a black man when compared with a white man because systemic racism competes with systemic patriarchy. If you do think that the immutable characteristics a person is born with are the most important things about them, I would encourage you to self interrogate how messed up that is.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            So it is the level of “privilege” that does or does not allow the commission of -isms then.

            No. It is the presence of privelege at all in the first place that holds all of us responsible to address that privelage as a reality when protecting one another.

            The better off the target is, the more acceptable discrimination is?

            No, I reject that characterization of what intersectionalist feminism is altogether. Read further for more.

            That is also a very Western perspective. It would be ok to tell Muslims in the Middle East that terrorism is their responsibility because their country’s power structure does put Islam firmly above others?

            No, because you are equivocating two different meanings of “responsibility.” Feminism calls for a brother’s keeper responsibility, not direct culpability responsibility. It is absolutely valid for example, to expect Islamic leaders or followers to speak out against violence — and they absolutely do without you or I even asking. Much similarly, I ask Christians in the U.S. to recognize their position of power and to speak out against christofascist or transphobic violence, and that happens also (though perhaps less frequently than I would like). On the same level, I ask all men to take brother’s keeper responsibility and to hold one another accountable, recognizing their position of privilege while taking steps to protect others, especially when it comes to listening to women expressing their lived experiences rather than talking over them.

            It’s a subtle difference but so incredibly important, so read it again if needed. Brothers keeper responsibility, not direct culpability.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      this comment section has been so enlightening about the makeup of this side of the fediverse. and all i can say is i am so sorry. i always guessed it was a male-heavy makeup but i never thought it would precipitate this badly.

      this community usually veers leftist and toward respecting human dignity, but it appears as soon as women express the pain and fear that is forced upon them for merely existing all of that is lost and their comments are getting 30/70 downvoted, even in conversations where folks have already acknowledged the caveat of the importance of non-alienating.

      it’s clear there is a lot of work to be done when one of the most progressive communities i have ever followed is so packed with malinformed spite as soon as the subject comes to humans asking for the basic privilege of safety.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Agreed and well said. It’s very disheartening. For me it’s just another example of how pervasive and ingrained the patriarchy and misogyny is.