ToastedPlanet to 196English · 1 year agoHarm Reduction Rulelockimagemessage-square211linkfedilinkarrow-up1480file-text
arrow-up1480imageHarm Reduction RulelockToastedPlanet to 196English · 1 year agomessage-square211linkfedilinkfile-text
There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIf that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn’t you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?
If that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn’t you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?