• Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tesla was overvalued when it hit 50$ pre stock split. Its continued rise over a period of years to one of the most valuable public companies is just mind boggling. But I think even now there is a lot of hesitance in shorting the stock as entire fortunes have been lost trying to predict a share price correction.

      But we’re about to find out whether Tesla truly transcends auto companies: https://bradmunchen.substack.com/p/could-tesla-go-bankrupt-the-odds

      • Hypx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Tesla is nothing more than an elaborate stock pumping exercise built on a business of selling crappy cars to techbros. It’s valuation is propped up by lies, hype and virtual signaling. It also can’t survive without copious amounts of government subsidies and low interest loans, since the car business is so capital intensive. At some point, all of these problems will come to a head. It’s a matter of when, not if, that Tesla collapses in some form. Though it may be bought out before formally filing for bankruptcy.

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          The Model 3 and Model Y combined for more than 500,000 units sold last year in the US alone. Do you really think it’s only tech bros buying them?

          • demonsword@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            7 months ago

            GM delivered five times that amount and yet Tesla is valued higher. It’s painfully obvious that Tesla’s stock is overpriced.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think bankruptcy is going to happen. Despite economists’ theoretical ideals, stock price has nothing to do with a company.

          Tesla is selling cars at a profit whether the stock is $20 a share or $200. Long term the stock price should go to $20.

      • Fermion@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        When considering shorting stocks it’s important to remember one of Keynes’ better quotes, “the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”

  • Juice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m expecting the company to go out of business and all of the cars to just brick.

    Might be a good move to figure out how to hack the software and/or reclaim the batteries for resale, might be kinda lucrative.

    On the other hand, if they do brick overnight it might be dangerous, and I hope Tesla demonstrates some responsibility to the lives and safety of their consumers. I don’t expect them to, but I hope so.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Even if they don’t fail, knowing how to hack them, how to replace the Tesla computer with your own that functions without Tesla approval, how to make the car function without self driving that might lock up the tires at highway speeds… These are valuable skills to have.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t trust the structural enough to use even if cheap, based on everything else. I could see breaking it down and using specific parts in a custom build using a real car as a base though.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are “too big to fail now”. If they pop now, the ruins will be bought quickly. The car won’t be allowed to brick. But it is good to highlight the issue that modern car need to be independ of the existence of manufacturers servers. I’d go further and regulate that it must be documented protocols and you must able to change the servers used if you choose.

      Same with any computer, if you don’t have admin, you don’t own it.

      • Juice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        too big to fail

        That’s a good point, it’s just as likely (to my cynical mind) that the U.S. govt would just bail them out to the tune of hundreds of billions

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Someone will step in and pick up the ashes. Question is will it be a company or the government.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          How would non-American consumers feel about the US government controlling there cars? Not sure all American consumers would be happy with that either. Why it’s OK for a company to have that power over your car is another issue…

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wouldn’t think the government itself would intervene. But possibly a government assigned entity so all those owners aren’t left high and dry.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think even without government sweeteners there would be plenty of buyers.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m expecting the company to go out of business and all of the cars to just brick.

      I agree that Tesla will not be able to maintain their current position, but currently Tesla is one of the most profitable car companies in the world. So chances they’ll go out of business anytime soon are very slim.
      That said I think they are currently about at their height, with a peek market recognition advantage in EV, earned from their first models where everybody else only made tiny lame city EVs with limited range. Now the competition is catching up and even sometimes surpassing Tesla, and the EV market is in a slump. This is a very different situation for Musk and Tesla to handle, and time will show how well they do that.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Because what you really want is a car that specifically depends on long term software updates, and is frequently the target of product recalls, from a company in financial freefall.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    1.81M units sold last, that’s $31,000/unit he wants to get paid. For pretty much single-handedly ruining the brand with his stupid yapper in a year.

    $2000 a unit price decrease doesn’t seem like much compared to that.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Speaking on his social media platform X over the weekend, Tesla supremo Elon Musk said price adjustments are an essential part of doing business in the auto industry.

    That was followed not long after by the company asking shareholders to reinstate Musk’s $56 billion pay package that was recently voided by a Delaware court – again, bad timing given the state of Tesla lately.

    Along with cutting prices over the weekend, Elon Musk also postponed a scheduled trip to India in which he was predicted to announce Tesla’s expansion into the country.

    EV sales have generally been on a decline of late, putting some of the world’s biggest manufacturers – like Tesla and Li – in a relatively tight spot.

    Tesla recently announced plans to kill its low-priced Model 2 vehicle – a seemingly ideal move when consumers want lower priced electric cars.

    PS: Mercedes now reckons it’s the first automaker to sell actual self-driving cars in America that don’t require drivers to keep an eye on the road.


    The original article contains 567 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • yessikg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What is actually happening is BYD is kicking everybody’s ass

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The company that straight up stole porsche car designs to build ‘their’ flagship? It’s not going to be available in the west until they can actually build their own cars.

        • yessikg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Their cars are already available in Europe and South America and they are building a plant in Mexico