• BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sounds like you’ve made a compelling argument as to why what you’re demanding isn’t a real option, so you’ll need a better excuse as to why you’re refusing the only rational option you have.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          he’s why it wouldn’t be an option. the rational option is ignoring your bullshit elections in favor of direct action, the emotional reaction is voting for the red team out of spite.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you talking about 2024? Because no there wasn’t. No party in the US holds more than a pro forma vote for presidential nominee if they have an incumbent running. Primaries in such years are specifically for lower offices. A President hasn’t been primaried in the US since Johnson declined to run again after getting beat horribly in polling and the New Hampshire primary.

      • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh, got em on the technicality!

        The OP you’re replying to was clearly highlighting that Warren isn’t a candidate for President, but because you caught that it was a lack of nomination rather than a lack of primary campaign that totally invalidates their point!