From the reports it is nowhere near proprietary systems, yet. Its a great development though and it shows what a single person can do for the community. We should shower this person with praise!

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    “I am intending on open-sourcing the entire stack (PCB schematic/layout, all the HDL, Windows WDDM drivers, API runtime drivers, and Quake ported to use the API) at some point, but there are a number of legal issues,” Barrie wrote in a Hacker News post on Wednesday. Because he works in a tangentially related vocation, he wants to make sure none of this work would break his work contract or licensing etc.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh that sucks. There is a chance greater than 0 that he has signed some sort of non-compete that would prevent him from open sourcing his project. But let’s hope his company is like xerox was with the mouse and waves it off, effectively allowing him to continue.

      • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Aren’t non-competes not legal? It’s a pile of corporate America horseshit, you can win their asses in court

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          IANAL, so I really do not know. But what I do know is that a lot of people do not have the resources to fight a company in court over it. I had an experience where I was unfairly terminated, and the lawyer I consulted with said I could take it to court, but it would most likely cost more than I’d receive. I’m sure that is a common sentiment in our (US) legal system as a whole.

        • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Non-competes aren’t enforceable, but proprietary “work-for-hire” clauses might be. I think the difference is that a company can’t stop you from working for a competitor, but they can force you to sign away your rights to anything you create while employed there. I have worked for a couple of big-box consulting companies, and they have you list anything you created before joining them, so any new creations are automatically theirs.