From the reports it is nowhere near proprietary systems, yet. Its a great development though and it shows what a single person can do for the community. We should shower this person with praise!

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh that sucks. There is a chance greater than 0 that he has signed some sort of non-compete that would prevent him from open sourcing his project. But let’s hope his company is like xerox was with the mouse and waves it off, effectively allowing him to continue.

    • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Aren’t non-competes not legal? It’s a pile of corporate America horseshit, you can win their asses in court

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        IANAL, so I really do not know. But what I do know is that a lot of people do not have the resources to fight a company in court over it. I had an experience where I was unfairly terminated, and the lawyer I consulted with said I could take it to court, but it would most likely cost more than I’d receive. I’m sure that is a common sentiment in our (US) legal system as a whole.

      • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Non-competes aren’t enforceable, but proprietary “work-for-hire” clauses might be. I think the difference is that a company can’t stop you from working for a competitor, but they can force you to sign away your rights to anything you create while employed there. I have worked for a couple of big-box consulting companies, and they have you list anything you created before joining them, so any new creations are automatically theirs.