• adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    Really wanted to like this game. The hype had me.

    I played it, waiting for it to get good. It just never did for me. Maybe I’m missing something, but after 10 hours I felt like I’d seen pretty much everything.

    As for the anti-cheat, I understand why they’d have that. I’ve played so many games where people cheat and it just kills the fun. Even when it is PvE.

    I don’t really understand the mindset of the cheaters though. Do they think we all talk about how great they are after the game is over? Like, Bobfucker326 sure did shoot more stuff than any random player I’ve ever seen, he must have a massive wang and be great at maths and stuff.

    • LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly the game doesn’t have that much content but I do love the gameplay loop. The emergent gameplay is fantastic in my opinion. The worst part is all the fucking technical issues

      • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        To be fair to them they’re deliberately holding back content to organically drip feed it in. I’m pretty confident we’ll see a new faction in the next week or two. And probably more vehicles in the next 4 weeks.

        It’s a bit rough around the edges and the patches introducing new issues like the arc weapon crash had been deeply upsetting. Hopefully we’re past the worst of it.

    • Fitzsimmons
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The game has a ton of subtle mechanics that it doesn’t really go out of its way to tell you about. So there’s a degree of mastery and cross-polination of strategy and builds that take advantage of those mechanics between groups, which adds a lot of fun for me. I respect how that’s not for everyone though.

    • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I like to play game normally, but i get bored easily… So i find it challenging to find a cheat or any bug and be ultra strong character or anything i want to be. I play games so i can relieve from my stress not to be stressful or frustrated to beat a boss.

      Yeah I agree cheat in PvP is Unfair.

      But cheat with PvE where I’m not harming anyone for their rank at leader board. That’s fine by me.

  • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m amazed it even works on linux, guess there is one benefit of using some shady unknown Korean kernel level anticheat instead of EAC.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      8 months ago

      EAC does work on Linux, developers just have to flip a toggle switch to support Linux. Some devs just don’t want to do that.

      Halo MCC, Apex Legends, Back 4 blood, and Smite are all games that use EAC and work on Linux.

      And basically no kernel anticheat will work on Linux. So Helldivers 2 isn’t kernel anticheat, just user-space.

      • sp6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Helldivers 2’s anti-cheat (nProtect GameGuard) is kernel-level on Windows, but has a userspace fallback for linux

        Edit: see this post

      • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I did forget apex legends works, boggles the mind that EA’s most popular multiplayer game just werks on linux. But most EAC using games don’t sadly.

  • infinitepcg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Does this game need client-side anticheat at all? It’s not PvP, so if you’re cheating, you just ruin the experience for yourself and maybe your teammates. But as far as I know, there are no rankings and not really any competition.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I haven’t played it, but it seems very similar to Deep Rock Galactic which does perfectly fine without anticheat.

      • pixeltree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Deep rock’s much less widely popular though, so it enjoys the benefits of a small, chill community

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Is it though? It had less explosive growth than Helldivers 2, but it sold 8+ million copies, not counting everyone playing it on game pass for free.

          Also this is hardly scientific, but just looking at my friends list (of 60 people), over 50% of my friends own deep rock, nearly making it the single most commonly owned game among my friends. The only games I see that are more popular are left4dead 2 and the portal games. In comparison, just over 25% of my friends have Helldivers 2. Obviously a sample size of 60 isn’t enough to extrapolate to overall popularity, but from what I’ve seen Deep Rock has been extremely consistently popular for years.

          It’s done well enough to turn its studio into an independent publisher, and just having a spin-off game sharing the Deep Rock name was enough to sell a million copies in a month of early access.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not ruining the fun is kind of the point, and not all hackers and cheaters are benevolent, greifing other players in their game.

      Further more, every victory adds to the score for that planet and factoring into the galactic score, which is the primary vehicle for storytelling to the community. Which the Devs clearly want to be a community effort of the players and also feedsback into how they balance the game.

      So cheaters or hackers adding a lot of false data or win to that pool could result in the devs overturning new content, nerfing existing items or buffing enemies to put the difficulty curve where they want it. I don’t think many players would appreciate a sudden difficulty spike because cheaters made the game too easy.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s probably mostly there to try to protect the microtransactions for some of the cosmetics.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The fuck it is. There’s no economy, simultaneous instancing, raids, rarity of weapons/armor/items/mounts, and the “DM” makes completely arbitrary game-wide decisions. Hell, there’s barely even a “levelling” system. You high? 🤪

        edit: not only is the "anti-cheat stupid simple to bypass, should you want to, the real concern should be that it’s a kernel-level invasion of privacy for no fucking reason… but who cares, right? 😅😶

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          No need for pinpoint accuracy when you are doing half a ton of explosives via close air support or heavy artillery from low orbit. Or worst: a mortar turret with no regard for friendlies.

    • cdipierr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Whether or not the game needs this anti-cheat feature, players are still finding ways to give other players huge amounts of Samples (a grindable resource with limited amounts included in each mission) and spawn in unreleased equipment and stratagems.

      So clearly the GameGuard isn’t as useful as it could be.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      the game updates based on the actions of other players, with planets being liberated and events having them taken back by the enemies. if the game had a big hacker problem it would negatively effect the game. plus having a hacker make your mission a free win would not be fun

      • anon987@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right? Ring 0 kernel level access is pretty stupid to give a random company. I was gifted this game on steam and immediately returned it.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really wanted to like helldivers and it was fun for a few days but I’ve just lost all interest just about, which is a shame because there is potential there

  • JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    So glad I didn’t waste my money on this. But why called it “Helldiver’s anti-cheat” there’s no way they’re using their own.

  • Dadbod89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well yeah, I would hope it limits the ability of some of them. Like the ones that are cheating, duh