Our sorcerer got some officers to confront the person who stole his identity and we turned the human trafficking ring over to the guard who pulled everyone out relatively safely.

But to even things out the sorcerer killed someone for his cloak and my rogue stole stuff from a person we later found out leaves the thieves’ guild the next session. Karmic balance.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It doesn’t really matter how you frame it, the existence of a police force is always going to necessitate power dynamics. Every form of policing exists to subjugate the public, from medieval guards who protect the crown to the modern day police force which is run by fascist gangs. There is zero context where you can go to an authority and not have to deal with those dynamics.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean maybe in real life. I had a game where one state was basically a commune. They had “guards” but they were volunteers from the community that were willing and able to do stuff like keep watch at night, make note of visitors, deescalate situations, and so on.

      It worked well. The players helped stop counter revolutionaries from restoring the (now undead) despotic king to the throne.

      Edit: there’s power dynamics in any situation. This one didn’t have authorities that were subjugating their people.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I really like this take. I wish more people would do that instead of just ignoring the elephant in the room.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Every form of policing exists to subjugate the public

      I mean when it’s to subjugate them to the law of “don’t kill people” then I suppose that’s a good thing