• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 months ago

    Naïve of you to think that this space needs a TV, when any house like this is probably large enough and expensive enough to have a proper home theater room with a proper projector and surround sound system.

    • Stoney_Logica1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re probably right for a home with this setup today. Back when these were really popular, probably not.

      Home theaters are a fairly recent thing and were not the norm, even for people with these types of setups, outside of maybe the uber rich who could afford a projector and the cost of prints. For a sense of costs, a Super 8 reel of a theatrical film would run anywhere from $600-$1000 (accounting for inflation).

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        If we are placing this setup in a time where a home theater would be prohibitively expensive, then it is also the time when a TV is a boxy space hoarding big blurb of NTSC/PAL glass. Making the whole TV discussion moot. There was probably a TV room with a more traditional sofa and a large wall embedded CRT TV. Still, in a house with a conversation pit there was no consideration for, nor expectation for a TV to be present in the living room. That is also a post modernist expectation, where screens are ubiquitous, demanded and expected to be present at all times.