• themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      405 months ago

      We have that. They’re called “plants.” If we just stop cutting down all the trees and poisoning the seas, plants will capture the carbon in the air and return it to the ground when they die. Or it will become part of the natural food chain.

      So don’t worry, either we will stop destroying all of the ecosystems, or the plants can fix the planet after we’re all gone.

      • @NoLifeKing@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        That doesn’t work because we added a shit load of Carbon we need to take out, we can also not just let the entire world become Forrest.

        • @anton
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          we can also not just let the entire world become Forrest.

          We could make charcoal from the trees and bury the same amount we dug up, but as long as we burn coal for power it’s kind of pointless.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Well it’s going to happen one way or the other. The only question is whether humans will be there for it.

          • @NoLifeKing@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Climate change won’t kill all humans itself, we are too efficient in adapting to environments, it can kill 90% of us if shit really hits the fan however thats unlikely. It will however definitely impact the quality of life and make everything harder cause wars and what not.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              I wouldn’t underestimate our capacity to fuck up the planet. When the food runs out and the water riots spread, things are going to go south very quickly for the human race. We like to make post apocalyptic movies about how we survive in the desert that used to be Iowa, building war-cars from scrap and isolated communities from the remainders. The reality is that almost everyone will die off without the electricity, medicine, and food production we have all come to rely upon. Gasoline will expire in the tanks of a million cars, and the ammo will run out faster than the potato chips. Farms will be pillaged, and GM seed stocks don’t produce a new generation.

              When society breaks down, all the little things will fall away, and we’ll all realize how actually few survival skills people actually have.

              • @NoLifeKing@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Well, as said if shit really hits the fan it may end in 90% less humans, but eradication is almost impossible unless we accidentally spread a virus that has a 100% mortality rate and several months until it shows symptoms we would have to fuck up so hard that it would be a actual achievement to do it.

                Shure quality of life degrades massively but its not impossible to live, knowledge still exists and its not a one day to the next event. Its more than possible to prepare for such things its however more expensive than solving the problem itself.

      • ReCursing
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Cutting the trees down is fine (well the ones we plant for the purpose I mean) - turn them into books and then store the books. As an added benefit you get books!

      • @GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I’m not a scientist by any stretch, but would disposing of plastics with these mushrooms in a terrarium of sorts help? They would have to be big and numerous.

        The mushrooms would break down the plastics into CO2 and water and the plants would absorb the CO2 and water. As the plastics start to go away, we could add more of our excess plastic to keep the cycle going.

        If this works, it also keeps the plastic eating mushrooms contained and away from all the essential plastics we have today.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Sounds like a good plan. I don’t know. Considering the rate at which we produce plastic, I doubt we could ever grow enough mushrooms to keep up, but it would be worth funding the research.

      • @School_Lunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I’ve always wondered how big an impact burying all grass clippings would have… I assume very little since I’ve never heard it mentioned before.

        • zout
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          You would have to bury them really deep to prevent them from being converted fully back to CO2, or worse methane, by other organisms.

          • @bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            Not to mention, all the nutrients that would normally be returned by their decomposition will never return back into the ecosystem.

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              We have a simple biologocial solution for all of that. Peatlands. They transfer the carbon into more and more stable chemical compounds that end up being sequestered. All the coal that is extracted now used to be peat some hundred million years ago.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Just leaving them on the ground allows them to decompose naturally. A better option is to not cut your grass, or have a native groundcover lawn.

    • zout
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Certain rocks/minerals will do this. But there is no financial driver today to do it.