cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/4605635

Spotify has removed offensive imagery associated with a controversial song by Christian rapper Tyson James and his 11-year-old son Toby James, following a complaint by GLAAD.

However, the song “Still 2 Genders,” criticized for its transphobic lyrics, continues to be available on the platform. Meanwhile, no changes have been made to Apple Music’s platform.

Earlier this month, The Advocatereported that the song was accessible on major music streaming platforms, including Spotify and Apple Music, despite its derogatory lyrics towards transgender individuals, including a slur to describe them. The situation caught the attention of GLAAD, which then took up the issue with Spotify’s trust and safety team.

In an updated statement provided to The Advocate, a spokesperson from GLAAD emphasized the importance of enforcing hate speech policies by companies.

“Companies have hate speech policies to protect all users from toxic content and especially from content that incites violence against marginalized people. When these policies are violated, it is important to see companies enforce them,” the statement read.

GLAAD’s statement highlighted the grave real-world implications of hateful rhetoric and imagery connecting it to a tragic incident.

“The terrible murder of Lauri Carlton, an ally who had hung a Pride flag outside her store, is connected to a suspect who had an image of a burning Pride flag pinned to his Twitter profile,” the statement added.

The spokesperson further noted, “Rhetoric, images, and targeting of LGBTQ people encourages real-world harms. Companies and brands must continue to recognize their responsibility to people’s safety and public safety and immediately act to avoid facilitating anti-LGBTQ hate and violence.”

Spotify responded by removing the album cover and video imagery that included a burning Progress Pride flag GLAAD noted to The Advocate. Despite these steps, the song itself, carrying an anti-trans slur and dehumanizing transgender people as “demons,” remains live on Spotify’s platform.

Both Spotify and Apple Music have policies in place to moderate content on their platforms. Apple Music for Artists’ terms of service stipulates that all lyrics provided to the platform must be “correct, accurate, and do not contain hate speech.” On the other hand, Spotify’s Dangerous Content policy bars “content that incites violence or hatred towards a person or group of people based on race, religion, gender identity or expression.”

Despite these policies, Apple Music has yet to make any changes or respond to inquiries regarding the song’s availability on its platform.

In a prior response, GLAAD had stressed the digital sphere’s struggle with hate speech moderation, especially concerning anti-LGBTQ+ content, which extends beyond the realm of music streaming platforms. Their concern was not only about the derogatory lyrics but also the inconsistency in enforcing content policies by these platforms, which undermines the safety and inclusivity of all users.

As the scrutiny continues, both Spotify and Apple Music remain unresponsive to multiple inquiries from The Advocate regarding this issue. This scenario underscores a broader discussion concerning digital content moderation on streaming platforms, especially around anti-LGBTQ+ content.

link: https://www.advocate.com/news/spotify-transphobic-song-glaad

archive link: https://archive.ph/tz9FX

  • -☆-
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I listen to a lot of trans punk (on Spotify), and I gotta say punk makes hate speech seem kinda tame. Stochastic terrorism sucks, and I don’t like being dehumanized, but a lot of the music I listen to on a daily basis calls for outright acts of political violence, mass murder, and dehumanizing political/religous leaders.

    I hate that this song exists as much as anyone, but removing it would set a dangerous precedent, so I’m kinda glad they didn’t.

    • squirrelOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I am over the kind of arguments that mega-corps can shrug off their responsibilities with some vague reference to “free speech”. Of course, Spotify doesn’t want to make any distinction because - dog forbid - they don’t want to pay for moderators.

      Nonetheless there is a distinction: Some trans punk singing about killing the US president is pure fiction, because their chance of pulling that off are near zero. A white supremacist singing about killing trans people is a credible threat, because they have the means and the opportunity to commit murder any time they want.

      • -☆-
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s honestly a great point I hadn’t considered. I’ll have to re-evaluate my stance on the issue

    • zea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they were committed to free speech, sure, but I imagine a song that said the same things about other minorities would be removed.