• xor
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      they tried breaking through the glass protecting the painting first, so they could destroy the actual painting

      Well that’s just straight up not true. Not only did they not try to break the glass, they did research in advance to ensure that the art was appropriately sealed to ensure they didn’t damage it. If your argument is so shaky that you feel the need to just fucking lie to make the people you don’t like look worse, maybe you might want to reconsider your stance instead of just committing even harder.

      Since you’re inevitably going to go “yEs ThEy DiD”, here’s a video of them doing it to get that over with in advance.

      https://youtu.be/BN-C5N60u_M?si=t50PSWfEz1pQ73hJ

      Edit: “won’t someone please think of the poor display cases?!”

      Jesus man, the planet is dying and you’re upset about a pane of glass getting soup on it - get your damn priorities straight

    • @mrpants@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      It’s not the oil of the day that they’re trying to stop burning but the oil of the many years to come.

      Making the activity of driving as inconvenient as possible is the goal and will work.

      Change and growth as a society is never easy and never will be.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      You can turn off the engine of an idle car. This argument is entirely “see what these people made us do” when the drivers enjoy wasting fuel on standing around.