• Maxxie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 days ago

    I only see mockery of accelerationists, which I broadly support. Its 10 times easier to reform an existing government that to destroy and build a good one from scratch.

    • lyricanna@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      To be fair, the only reason I sound like an accelerationist, is because the building is clearly on fire right now and I’m presuming its structural at this point. So yeah, while I wish it didn’t get to this point, it feels likely that we will have to rebuild things from the ground up.

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not when the existing government is built to concentrate and protect current property relations. Sure have parallel structures built to replace what exists but don’t reform, revolt.

      • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        Difficulty of reform aside, the pain and suffering that will come from societal collapse will be immense. The chance of successfully building a better system out of the crumbled remains is low. I don’t think it’s a great aspiration.

      • segabased@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        This isn’t happening

        Accelerationism is happening towards fascism. This would be a different story if socialism was on the rise with parallel structures in place to rescue us during the collapse

        Literally this is not happening nor will happen. Not even close, it blows my mind other leftists think fascism provides opportunity. “Things are going to be great after this is all said and done!” As we’re rounded up and deported to El Salvador

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      While I agree in theory, it assumes the existing system has rational or somewhat rational actors.

      If your system is full of counter productive individuals, it might be easier to start fresh.

      This works better with groups and companies, entire countries, not so much.