Haven’t watched the video, but I think just the conversation this created ended up being interesting to me. A handful of extra views won’t do any harm.
copygirl
Just a dorky trans woman on the internet.
My other presences on the fediverse:
• @copygirl@fedi.anarchy.moe
• @copygirl@vt.social
- 29 Posts
- 248 Comments
color_rect.set_instance_shader_parameter
should work, as long as thecolor_rect
is unique to each instance of the card, rather than being reused. If you assigned it in the node editor you could check the “Local To Scene” checkbox. Assuming cards are defined as separate scenes you instantiate. Otherwise you couldduplicate()
the resource in code.The same would be true for
color_rect.material.set_shader_parameter
for theShaderMaterial
. If you could ensure it’s unique per card, it should work. However, duplicating the material might not be as ideal, especially since the other option is also available.A little tip: You could try print debugging with the
get
functions before and after you useset
to see what the value was before (and notice that it might be the same as the previousset
call from another card) and that it was correctly set afterwards. (Assuming I’m correct about diagnosing the problem.)edit: Actually, my advice is only true if
color_rect
was a resource, but I think it’s a node, specifically a sub-class ofCanvasItem
orGeometryInstance3D
, so it should already be unique for each instantiated card. So without more information I’m not sure whyset_instance_shader_parameter
is not working.
Tangentially related: Oh boi I just love AI bros coming out of nowhere defending GenAI when nobody asked for their opinion. Wish more communities / instances would take a hard anti-AI stance and just get rid of them. It’s not like anyone will make them see where they’re wrong.
You see, it’s not the internet censorship tool that prevents you from speaking your mind, it’s the people that control it!
You can dislike the tool.
AI was built on stolen work, and will not create a generation of future artists that simply has a new tool available. It’ll create a generation of workers that create profit for the wealthy class by generating garbage until it’s somewhat presentable. Meanwhile, AI will starve out because it will run out of data to learn from.
Generative AI is the current fad of the tech bro world and it’s what everyone clings onto because if everything goes well (for them), they can get future generations hooked and make stupid money. Meanwhile, media literacy will further decline, and with it the ability to look up anything on the internet, making it even more easy for the masses to be controlled.
Perhaps after having familiarized with GDScript, learning C# with the same game engine and API is also an interesting way to learn another programming language. There’s also extensions for other languages, like Rust.
most of the the Arch cult forget to mention that
The “Arch cult’s” holy book, the ArchWiki, states the following pretty clearly:
Warning: AUR packages are user-produced content. These
PKGBUILD
s are completely unofficial and have not been thoroughly vetted. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.Mention of one’s use of the AUR for their needs doesn’t need to come with a disclaimer.
People who don’t read or don’t use their brain are going to keep not doing so, regardless.
copygirlOPto Game Development@programming.dev•"Proof" of Valve's wrongdoing in antitrust class-action lawsuitEnglish3·1 month agoTo add to what you’re saying: To be fair, most of the lawsuit I don’t really agree with, but maybe it’s just laying it on thick.
Part of the argument is them trying to separate the Steam “Store” from the Steam “Gaming Platform”, and in many ways that’s obviously not possible. But they say that because of Steam’s monopolistic-ish position, publishers can’t not be on the “gaming platform”, because it’s where most people want their games, or else they’ll lose out of a large chunk of money. (And without it, these games likely would not be made in the first place.) Thus Steam can force these unfair terms on developers.
There was also this portion on discounts that was quite revealing:
- For example, Valve has set up visibility in its Steam Store to focus on games that are nominally “on sale” to gamers. Knowing that the best way to reach their audience is through discounting, game publishers must artificially inflate their list prices so they have headroom for discounting. But the “sale” price is not consistently available, and therefore some gamers pay an artificially inflated list price for the game. These supracompetitive prices increase Valve’s cut, force gamers to overpay, and prevent publishers from setting the most efficient game prices they could in the first place. Even worse, these supracompetitive prices are transmitted across the broader market by the contractual restraints discussed above.
They’re admitting to inflating games’ prices, so they can then offer a fake discount that’s closer to the actual price they actually wanted the game to be. And then they complain when Valve doesn’t let them list a game on sale for an extended period of time, just so they can essentially scam people. (Probably, once again, standard in the industry and elsewhere, but I feel like that’s gotta be banned by EU pro-consumer laws.)
copygirlOPto Game Development@programming.dev•"Proof" of Valve's wrongdoing in antitrust class-action lawsuitEnglish4·1 month agoThe EU can and should force Steam to get rid of the MFN clause. All Valve needs to do is to let competing stores price games cheaper than on Steam. (So long as Steam services are not involved with that off-Steam purchase.)
There’s still plenty of benefits Steam provides to customers that many may choose it over a different store even if they could get the game for cheaper. And Steam also provides developers with tools that make Steam worth it, like Steam networking and cloud saves. As Gabe Newell famously said about piracy, but I believe this applies in this case too, it’s simply a service problem.
copygirlOPto Game Development@programming.dev•"Proof" of Valve's wrongdoing in antitrust class-action lawsuitEnglish1·1 month agoAnd this was only mentioned in a footnote in the complaint document, though I saw it many times when browsing through the earlier lawsuit documents. Interestingly, this sounds like it should already be illegal in the EU, as per the Wikipedia link you gave.
copygirlOPto Game Development@programming.dev•"Proof" of Valve's wrongdoing in antitrust class-action lawsuitEnglish2·1 month agoHow clear is the wording? Is it possible to find the text of the terms / agreement / contract online? Or is it covered by an NDA?
copygirlOPto Game Development@programming.dev•"Proof" of Valve's wrongdoing in antitrust class-action lawsuitEnglish5·1 month agoThis is true! Vintage Story does it, for example. They’re doing okay from what I can tell, but it’s more of an exception. It’s pretty clear that they are losing out on potential customers. Notably, you also lose out on regional pricing, which is pretty difficult to set up yourself. If you’re creating games for a living, you don’t have much of a choice about whether you put your game on Steam.
copygirlto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•I'm sure this has been posted here before, but it's too good not to repost.English15·1 month agoBecause we are talking about someone using AI for most if not all tasks that involve thinking and/or creativity, as if it was any other tool.
copygirlto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•I'm sure this has been posted here before, but it's too good not to repost.English14·1 month agoFirst of all, it’s hypothetical. If only for the fact that using a wheelchair in real-life actually greatly increases difficulty getting around. The point is that if you don’t lose your muscles, they get weaker. Happens with anyone that has an accident that causes them to be unable to use their muscles for a prolonged amount of time. See also: Astronauts needing to exercise while in space or back on earth because they’ve not had to use many of their muscles as much due to lack of gravity.
That’s not true, it makes me more efficient!
ChatGPT, write a thoughtful response to this article that proves that AI makes people smarter. Make it multiple paragraphs. Find a way to include Microsoft requiring all its programmers to use Copilot (or else they get fired) in a positive way.
Also please give me a summary of your response, because I don’t want to bother reading it all.
Fair point, but many photos are not edited to the point of fundamentally changing them. I wouldn’t call a touched up wedding photo a “fake”.
edit: I guess I was distracting from the point. Yes, “AI” already implies “fake”. Guess if someone were to look for “how to spot fake photos” this would help them find this video?
TL;DW:
- Check the “residual noise”
- Parallel lines should converge to a single point (vanishing point)
- Connect shadows to what casts them, extend the lines, they should meet at the light source
As opposed to fake photoshopped photos, I suppose?
Once you do get everything set up and working, all you’d need to federate is to start subscribing to some communities. If you’re not “listening”, you won’t “hear” anything.
That probably counts as a privileged page, as in something uBlock Origin can’t access or modify.
Mozilla has probably been running another “experiment”, meaning not every user is affected. In the past they claimed it’s not advertisements because they are “continually looking for more ways to say thanks for using Firefox”. (Bullshit.) If you go to Settings > Home, you disable anything you don’t want to see, or just set your home page to a blank page, period.
Certainly not Linux’ fault if developers write shitty Electron apps and then put a bunch of OS-specific stuff in it.
Also, try Vesktop? I like that I can customize my experience a little more with the plugins.
All my homies hate Snap.