prompt: A cafe at the North Pole named “Opposites”

ironically has 5 petals

will be warmer than the other wolves this winter

“ma’am wait! you dropped your shoe!”

i find ai is not the best at understanding actual creativity. It has a tendency to see the unusual part of what you are saying and think “that’s abnormal, surely that’s not what is meant, i better do the normal way”. I find in SD1.5, since it’s old, it at least SEEMS creative because of the chaos. But I often go to SDXL or SD3.5 with an extracreative idea I want to be really specifically done perfectly and, instead, it makes a ‘perfect’ image not of what my idea was but of the nearest human commoner concept a noncreative boring person with no creativity would have. As ai modernizes, it seems better at images that don’t think outside the box, and converts prompts outside the box to being within.

Also I hope my current view is incorrect and I HEAR midjourney (which i haven’t used) is good at prompt specificity

lovely phrase

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…

This in the examples amazes me. My own prompts barely are anything yet in comparison.

Also I am amazed by the naturalness of people with wings, tails, dogs, etc. Like how did ai learn her wings should do this when making this expression?

so romantic

thank you Glass!

ya lol

the original image was exceptionally bad quality also, which may have affected that ~i just liked the locations of the people and totally thought ‘musical dance number’

Still can’t make centaurs.

ty

thank you!

:)

I like that one too :)

that’s where i make my pictures :)

has 4 legs like normal at least

Sorry about mine being the best

prompt: ((((((an extrarare twohorned unicorn among a bunch of gazelles))))))

“You do not mention the path of the electron at all, Heisenberg. But yet when you look in a cloud chamber the electron’s track can be observed quite directly.” “Don’t you think that it’s strange to say that there is a path for the electron in the cloud chamber, but there is no path for the electron in the atom?” ~Einstein

Yeah weird it would then be pure probability with no causes when it’s inside the atom because that’s what matches the mathematical framework of Quantum Physics while when it’s in a cloud chamber ITS EXACT LOCATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. So yeah I’m with reality instead of that mathematical framework and don’t see any issue with the same concept of ‘having a form’ applying to entanglement ~which 100% blows up Bell’s theorem before it gets to multilocation.

Bell’s Theorem —> 💥

Possibility of Hidden Variables —> 👍