0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196 · 9 个月前rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1723cross-posted to: femcelmemes
arrow-up1723imagerulelemmy.ml0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196 · 9 个月前message-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: femcelmemes
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 个月前C===3 needs some kind of javascriot explanation.
minus-squareKrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-29 个月前C===3 // likely to be false, depending on type of C C==3 // likely to be true, depending on value of C How you interpret this information is on you. Also please note that below statement is valid Javascript. That is all. UwU? “What’s this” :3
minus-squarejballs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 个月前Did you just prove that short dicks evaluate as true?
minus-squareKrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 个月前If someone has you wondering if they’re compensating for something, it’s probably true.
:O C===3
:OC===3
:O==3
:O=3
:3
C===3 needs some kind of javascriot explanation.
C===3 // likely to be false, depending on type of C
C==3 // likely to be true, depending on value of C
How you interpret this information is on you. Also please note that below statement is valid Javascript. That is all. UwU? “What’s this” :3
Did you just prove that short dicks evaluate as true?
If someone has you wondering if they’re compensating for something, it’s probably true.