• spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know that Boeing’s on everyone’s shit list these days, but the company doesn’t even make aviation tires. Unless a failure in one of Boeing’s systems caused tire damage this is probably due to poor maintenance by the airline, or a defective tire manufactured by Goodyear, Michelin, Bridgestone or Dunlop.

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Boing makes the plane. If they choose to contract out portions, they are responsible for managing the subcontractors; which includes quality control.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, they literally might not have installed this tire. It’s like blaming Toyota for a flat on your 2010 Corolla.

    • False@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s telling that they’ve got their reputation at the point where any time there’s a problem with an air plane people assume it was them.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The core issue causing the quality control issues with Boeing is actually that they are outsourcing more and more of the design and manufacturing of their planes, and then squeezing their contractors, knowing that their contractors don’t have any other options, aerospace is both regional and consolidated. Boeing will gladly point out whenever there is a failure that it is the fault of the contractor that designed the relevant part or system, but it’s generally not that the contractor was incompetent, but rather that they were given an unreasonably tight budget and forced to deliver something.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was about to ask. We’ll have to wait for information on which component failed here.

      If all Boeing planes are questionable, it’s reasonable to ask what the US government will do about it. They’re the definition of too big to fail, but at the same times lives are very directly in the balance.

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thought i just had to avoid getting on a Boeing, now i have to watch out for the ones in the sky?

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why is everyone so obsessed with this? Should not be a surprise: You all know Boeing was named after the sound of falling parts hitting the ground, right?

  • jenny_ball@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    God these airline companies need a overhaul. stop stuffing the flights and make them a few inches more roomy. stop cutting corners. offer good refund policies and shit. they are such bastards

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Boeing has had issues for a while. I work in commercial aviation certification and all the senior engineers I work with are ex-boeing guys who took the early retirement plan some years ago when it was offered. According to them anyone who knew anything left and the competition from Airbus has forced them to attempt to speed up the certification process. The FAA gets final approval over new airplane designs but more of the engineering review and approval comes from a private ODA, which Boeing has their own. You have a company despite for sales who can “approve” their own designs. There is definitely corporate pressure forcing approvals to go faster.

  • bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    SF Chronicle: “You’ve got an ad blocker installed”

    Inspect element: “This is not the ad blocker you’re looking for”

  • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Shocker that quality took a dive when Boeing stopped using North American labour to build their planes in favour of developing countries.

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lol what? The merger with the McDonnell Douglas Corporation (defense contractor) and continued focus on cheaping out on R&D costs, especially safety related tests, while maximizing investor payouts has way more to do with the quality of their planes than where they’re manufactured.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      I didn’t think you could have a racist take on Boeing’s sudden drop in quality and yet liberals will always find a way.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I imagine you think quality planes are still riveted together by the hand of a team of buxom broads.

      • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, Quality was when the wing struts were made in Canada with a single, massive CNC mill. Not in a developing country by near-slave labour.

  • Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Flying is the safest way to travel is what the airlines want you to think Hank!

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s a lot of crapping on Boeing here, and don’t get me wrong, they’ve earned the criticism. However, I’d be very surprised if this incident wasn’t actually traced back to maintenance issues with the airline.

    If course, that was also my thought when i first heard about the plug door, and it lasted up until I learned the plane was so new it likely hadn’t even been through it’s first A check.