• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It was his math contributions people liked. Particularly his invention of calculus which could be used to solve a plethora of unsolved math problems. It’s not because he said things fell.

    • Eiim
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      On the other hand, spontaneous generation was very much still a thing at this point, so a lot of the basic rules of the world around us were really not worked out yet

      • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        it was not discredited until the work of the French chemist Louis Pasteur and the Irish physicist John Tyndall in the mid-19th century.

        There was a post on lemmy the other day about things that get their names from real people. I forgot that “pasteurize” was also one

    • Xtallll
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I love that Newton had to invent calculus twice, because he was trying to teach it to someone else and they weren’t getting it, so Isaac got frustrated and threw the only copy of his notes into the lit fireplace.

      • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        It turned out in his favour, because he then discovered that if you throw things in a fire, they burn.