I think I’m going to check out more of River City Girls 2 which I restarted last weekend. It got an update which makes it way more playable, I hadn’t played for months, but the input lag was excruciating before. Maybe some Mario Wonder which I haven’t played in a while (and still need to finish!).

What about you? What have all of you been playing?

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    How did you feel about Skyrim and Fallout 4? Because it’s the same game, but in space.

    I would give it a B. The sheer size of the game is impressive (I completed 200 plot quests), and several of the quests, or at least the ideas contained within, are memorable—particularly some of the side quests. The ship builder is also a highlight, though I wish Bethesda would fix their janky camera issues. And the FPS gun mechanics are better than in their previous games.

    But they also tried way too hard to make this a game people would want to play endlessly in new game plus, and there’s just not enough variety or real consequences to justify that. Once you play through it, that’s basically it. Sure, you could support this faction over that faction, but it doesn’t actually make any material difference in the game until what is effectively an ending clip show. They might have 120 star systems and thousands of worlds to land on, but one can only stand so much same-y autogenerated content. This is why I don’t play looter shooters.

    And for a game about space travel, they really made actually traveling in space pretty unimportant via fast travel. Many of the systems, like outpost building, don’t really have a point, and the companions, while much better realized than Skyrim, are still not quite at the Mass Effect level. Don’t get me started on how the characters don’t seem to be situationally aware or adjust their tone or responses based on the world. There are only so many stop-everything heart-to-heart chats I can have during a life-or-death firefight.

    But like I said, overall there’s enough there that I found worthwhile. Most people won’t spend as long on it as I did, but I think it’s a pleasant way to spend 50-150 hours.

    • slimerancher@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Skyrim in space, that’s all I wanted from Starfield, but then I heard it’s not Skyrim, it’s something else, and maybe not as good. Anyways, it’s kind of a game that I would try myself, no matter what the reviewers say. It’s nice to see that there are people who are enjoying it for 100+ hours. Hopefully all the QoL releases by the time I get around to it, will make it much better.

      Thanks for the details!

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Skyrim in space, that’s all I wanted from Starfield, but then I heard it’s not Skyrim, it’s something else, and maybe not as good.

        You heard correctly. The biggest thing about Bethesda games has always been exploration, and Starfield utterly fails at it. There are things to enjoy about Starfield, but not the one thing Bethesda is known best for.

        • xyzzy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The reason I said Skyrim or Fallout 4 was not to invoke exploration, but all the typical trappings of a Bethesda game, the quests, the engine, the mechanics that are sort of vaguely interesting but don’t always hang together well, etc.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh yeah, the worst things about Bethesda games are there in spades! That said, I got some enjoyment out of it - the NASA museum part was particularly well-done.