starman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish · 9 months agoPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1325 cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansopensource@lemmy.mllibre_software@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1325external-linkPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.comstarman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square23fedilink cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansopensource@lemmy.mllibre_software@lemmy.ml
minus-squareKissaki@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 months agoI don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
minus-squareDark Arc@social.packetloss.gglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-29 months agoI think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo.
minus-squarenoddy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there’s different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?).
I don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments.
You might not like the admins of
example.org:foobut you might have no issues with the admins ofexample.com:foo.I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there’s different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?).