I WFH, every year one of the goals that the rest of the team decides is that it’s “so great” to see each other in person. The past few years haven’t worked out but one did. I spent hours in a couple of airports, the huge expense for the company, I spent days away from my family, and for what? So you could look me in my same face you would see if we turned cameras on every once in a while? My husband says I’m being weird, but I legitimately want to know, what is the benefit? I hate being there and have to play nice so you can…look me even closer in the face?

  • TheAlbatross
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 months ago

    Some people really like in-person socialization. There’s something lost in the webcam only meeting. I’m glad you adapted well to the circumstances of the pandemic, but not everyone faired so well. I can tell ya I went a lil bonkers not being able to see people in person.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      9 months ago

      How you felt, going bonkers, is roughly how many introverts feel being around people. So, the three years that introverts felt good in the history of… forever, many of us would like to keep that. I just ask that extroverts respect how shitty the workforce is especially for introverts and maybe try to get their social needs met in their personal life and not demand that work time also fit only their needs. At the expense of others.

      • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 months ago

        As an introvert, as much as I feel weird aroind people, I feel even weirder video chatting with people I’ve never met in person. In that situation, I have no idea how to read people and the expectations are way harder to try to meet. This makes meetings even worse until I meet them.

        While I agree that forced in person work daily is insane, the OP is complaining about meeting people in person once after many years, which feels equally as ridiculous. IMO even for widely dispersed teams, meeting a few times a year seems ideal.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          Some people do not care about reading people or meeting expectations of people at work. They just want to do whatever is strictly necessary to get some money to live, and then get away from the whole thing.

          • dmention7@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            They may not care, but reading people and meeting expectations of your colleagues is pretty much a bare minimum level of functioning for most professional positions.

            I’m a massive introvert and would love to not have to rely on those social aspects of work, but they undeniably make me more effective at my job and make life easier in the long run. It’s no different than physical exercise or any of the million other things in life that might be a bit unpleasant but are ultimately good for you.

            • Azzu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Well… no

              As long as you don’t get fired, there’s no need to do any of these things, if you literally don’t care what happens at your job, then there’s no need to be effective or anything like that. You don’t need to be liked, you don’t need to care what your coworkers think, you just need to do enough work that it’s useful to employ you.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      We’re social animals, socialization benefits us. WFH is better overall, but meeting up now and again has clear benefits.

      Just commented here, and the anti-social folks seem to disagree, even though I’m mainly agreeing with them. Go figure.