I don’t think that’s true at all. The RNC controls both chambers, the impeachment bill (which wouldn’t remove him anyway) would never pass. So the cowardly could still vote for it knowing full well it’ll never happen.
The DNC aren’t truly against Trump, you gotta remember, otherwise they would have taken action to safeguard the country from fascist rule instead of spending the last 4 years largely doing fuck all.
You’re 100% right, but it’s not like impeachment seems to do anything about the Trump problem. What’s a third impeachment gonna do?
Insane that our taxes go to this. Our tax dollars belong in the pockets of hard working billionaires, oil companies and weapons manufacturers.
Oh honey get the fuck out now, that’s not a man, that’s a time bomb.
He doesn’t see you as a sapient person, he sees you as a fickle object he must appease just enough so he can get what he wants from you. Because of that, there isn’t anything you can say that will help him today.
The break up won’t be pretty, but you’ll be so much happier with someone else in the long term.
I’m not arguing that Obama is worse than Trump or vice versa. I don’t think anything will meaningfully change unless we can acknowledge that the US is inhumanely monstrous to immigrants regardless of which party is in charge. Obviously Trump’s escalated use of ICE like Gestapo is abhorrent, but it isn’t a new role for the agency.
I’m just looking at numbers from this article , which is citing TRAC data, putting Obama at 3.1M people deported and Trump at 932T for his first term and “about 200k during his first four months”. It also notes that this is lagging behind the deportation numbers of Biden during a similar time frame.
It’s true that we may not know the full extent of either administration’s horrors for many years.
Kinda weird day to announce this
80°F by 7:30 A.M. and humid enough to drink. Feels like a hellish car for sure.
Trump is still over a million people under Barrack’s deportation record. It’s a vile machine that hasn’t stopped or faltered regardless of which party rules.
I actually wonder why this church was prepared for that. Synagogues will often have armed security but that’s because they’re a target for Nazi extremists.
I think it’s nigh impossible to come up with strict rules about these things.
I also think it’s fine that women have spaces that are just for them.
I think the message is poignant, but the artist did a bit of a “I’ve already drawn you as the Virgin and myself as the Chad” thing that’s hard not to notice.
We live in a gerontocracy, of course our leaders are going to be suffering from cognitive decline.
Bro’s just mad that Trump is gunning to beat his deportation numbers, but no worries Barrack you still have the lead by over a million.
It’s utterly baffling that the dnc isn’t as obstructionist as the rnc if they truly hold the ideals they claim to
I’m in a SFH but all the bathrooms are very proximal to the heater so it slaps
I’m so thrown off by our current shower which legit heats up in 2 seconds. I was so used to waiting like a minute for it to warm up, I built my rituals around that. But this one… it’s just hot, like right away. Bizarre
What’s with the hostility here?
Hey I’m actually baffled by your reply. You clearly didn’t know there were 5 actors who played Alexander, because if you did, you’d know they were mostly one offs, from a different series at a different age or, uh, a photograph. It’s like you saw my comment, decided to reply to it, searched “Star Trek Alexander actor” and read the headline of the first result, a Screen Rant article titled “Star Trek: All 5 Actors Who Played Worf’s Son, Alexander”, and decided “That’s enough info, I’m ready to reply to that comment.”
Clearly you didn’t read the article, otherwise you wouldn’t reply the way you did, because you’d know why there’s 5 Alexander’s and it wasn’t because the writers were trying to fix the issue.
I’m not mad or annoyed or anything, I’m just utterly baffled by how you use the internet.
Wild to think they’re doing anything but sitting on their asses