• mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Dunno what “natives” you’re planting, but if you have a true native landscape, there’s very little maintenance. You just have to work with the right people (i.e. - not landscapers) to help select a true low-maintenance, lawn. If you plant the right mix, you can have a really nice looking lawn that has different native flowering plants throughout the growing season and will look really nice.

    If you’re spending hours a day, or even hours a week, you probably want a very specific, manicured look. Or you didn’t do the right planting mix.

    https://www.prairiemoon.com/ is a great resource for this stuff.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Native plants still need to be deadheaded, still need to be pruned and trimmed.

      Native plants still require maintenance, they just have better synthesis with the other plants.

      The time is for the amount of plants. Yeah having 4 plants in a small yard is easy work, but 4 plants in a large yard would look barren and empty… so more plants, more work. If 4 plants are 5 minutes of work a week, 40 plants is 50 minutes. For a similar yard of turf it would be 30 minutes of mowing. Now you have to maintain your grass, can’t mow since it’s not all turf, and still need to deal with the additional plants. It’s x+y, not x or y….

      People who buy into this “native is easier” is being sold a bridge that requires more work down the road if they don’t want it to look like shit. For a few years it’s fine, and why every rants about it, because it hasn’t reached the issue point yet. Native plants thrive more, or should, meaning they require more work since they you know, grow and spread easier….

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re uneducated on the topic and talking like you have all the facts. I have a large property that looks like the top image, and it’s extremely low maintenance compared to a manicured lawn. I don’t have to dead-head flowers, because they’re incorporated into a larger planting, so it looks perfectly natural to have a few flowers in multiple stages of their lifecycle along side the rest of the property. NORMAL nature looks beautiful and not messy.

        Sure, if you have a row of “native” flowers in a bed of mulch, they take maintenance. In that case, don’t have a native lawn, you have a few native plants in an unnatural ecosystem.

        Natives are easier, much lower maintenance, better for the environment, and look much better unless you’re used to flat, green, golf courses.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          What’s so magical about native plants that you think they don’t require the same regular maintenance of any other plants?

          If you don’t dead head, those seeds will blow all over your yard, meaning you need to weed them, or your yard is a mess since it’s all over the place. Or the plants get so dense are competing with each other chocking each other out. I’m sorry this was never properly explained to you.

          People sell “native” yards to people who think they can neglect their yards. Theres a reason why they don’t show established yards in their marketing lmfao.

          • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You are talking about a native patch in a non-native yard. That’s not how this works. You make a native YARD. The fact that they spread seeds is a GOOD THING. It’s not a weed, because it belongs there.

            It’s self-seeding, it’s self-maintaining. It’s not magic, it’s evolution. The plants are supposed to be there, they want to be there, the ground wants them to be there, nature wants it to be there. You’re building a house in nature, not putting a tiny spot of non-natural nature in your lawn.

            The maintenance is less, but you still have some. You just need to make sure that invasives stay out, but past that, it’s mostly self-maintaining.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Having one flower gets its seeds under another plant can cause issues of competition, even with native plants.

              Uhh native doesn’t mean self seeding or self maintaining. Your native plant isn’t native here and does the same exact thing unless it’s invasive…

              You claim I’m uneducated and you only spout marketing they sell to people who haven’t read or studied horticulture.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Heres a great resource so you can educate yourself instead of repeating marketing verbatim.

              Great point right here for you

              Because native plants are uniquely suited to their geography, they are able to grow with little need for human inputs. Natives require less water, fertilizer or pesticides. They simply need to get established and then you barely need to do anything. Apparently non-natives are the exact opposite. They constantly need watered and fertilized. They are always plagued by insects and need sprayed all of the time. If you see a sick or diseased plant in your neighborhood, rest assured, it’s definitely a non-native. 🙄