• smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That doesn’t make sense. Social media rules aren’t written in stone.

    All forms of communication/media/technology evolve over time. Going backwards is regressive.

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on what going backwards means, from a technical perspective this is fine and more forward than the centralized providers would have you believe. The only step back im seeing is mainly UI and tooling. The bones here are fine and the UX im seeing on Lemmy and Kbin are inline with reddit just a few years ago.

      If having to deal with UX issues is a huge problem the just wait and come back when its more developed, most of what you use in your day-to-day computing is OSS code, if its good enough for your daily work, its good enough for socials.

      • smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know, maybe I didn’t understand the full meaning of your comment - I assumed you were referring to not having the ability to block a user as a “return to how social was meant to be on the internet”

        • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          why would I not be able to block a user on the internet? I was able to block them on every system from the beginning. Centralized services will have you think you need thier magic code to do that but we used to do it with clients all the time.

          I still run IMAP email clients with a boat load of personal rules, though I did move the blocks to my server for efficiency. Still its MY server, like im posting to you now from my fediverse instance. If i wanted to block someone here they can be annoying sure but at the end of the day I have many of the same tools i had before, though there might be more cat and mouse. That said nothing stops you from having entirely private instances and since we technically can completely control our servers and clients its entirely possible to have things like one-way servers and nodes that are more picky about what they forward. If the network grows you will see an increased sophistication in management tools.

          • smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But we were talking about Twitter specifically, not any sort of self-hosted platform or personal site.

            I don’t disagree with you, I’m just confused when the discussion moved from Twitter to an anecdote about one’s IMAP email client

          • hyazinthe@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Recently, here on lemmy, someone explained Usenet in its days, and said that you yourself couldn’t block others, but only ask the ISPs to. Isn’t that “social” without being able to block others?

            Besides, I feel like @smokinjoe@lemmy.world didn’t want to suggest that you were not able to block others in the past, just stating what he assumed you meant, without evaluating.