• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    hmm, i though websites just blocked crawler traffic directly? I know one site in particular has rules about it, and will even go so far as to ban you permanently if you continually ignore them.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          Except that it’d also catch out people who use accessibility devices might see the link anyways, or use the keyboard to navigate a site instead of a mouse.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            i don’t know, maybe there’s a canvas trick. i’m not a webdev so i am a bit out of my depth and mostly guessing and remembering 20-year-old technology

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If it weren’t so difficult and require so much effort, I’d rather clicking the link cause the server to switch to serving up poisoned data – stuff that will ruin a LLM.

          • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Visiting /enter_spoopmode.html will choose a theme and mangle the text for any page you next go to accordingly (think search&replace with swear words or santa clause)

            It will also show a banner letting the user know they are in spoop mode, with a javascript button to exit the mode, where the AJAX request URL is ofuscated (think base64) The banner is at the bottom of the html document (not nesisarly the screen itself) and/or inside unusual/normally ignored tags. `

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Would that be effective? A lot of poisoning seems targeted to a specific version of an LLM, rather than being general.

            Like how the image poisoning programs only work for some image generators and not others.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well you can if you know the IPs that come in from but that’s of course the trick.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There are more crawlers than I have fucks to give, you’ll be in a pissing match forever. robots.txt was supposed to be the norm to tell crawlers what they can and cannot access. Its not on you to block them. Its on them, and its sadly a legislative issues at this point.

      I wish it wasn’t, but legislative fixes are always the most robust and complied against.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        yes but also there’s a point where it’s blatantly obvious. And i can’t imagine it’s hard to get rid of the obviously offending ones. Respectful crawlers are going to be imitating humans, so who cares, disrespectful crawlers will ddos your site, that can’t be that hard to implement.

        Though if we’re talking “hey please dont scrape this particular data” Yeah nobody was ever respecting that lol.