• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s either in /sdcard/Downloads or /external/emulated/0/android/data/com.google.chrome/Downloads. Couldn’t be easier.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      Couldn’t be easier.

      Would certainly be easier if there wasn’t an or in your statement.

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Except when it is not…

      For example Boost saves photo is some photo folder somewhere.

      The only way i can find anything is using a photo app and scanning my entire phone to find things.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        I was being facetious. Yeah, every app saves into a different location. It’s bonkers.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sandboxing is a good thing. It makes it a lot easier and safer for billions of devices to run millions of apps.

          • somethingp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure except that we already have computers where every app uses the same folder structure, just with some files/folders protected with elevated permissions that aren’t accessible to every app. We already have a solution that works and every desktop OS uses. Why would mobile go for a solution that isn’t actually usable?

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              The desktop solution isn’t feasible in the mobile context. Even for desktops, you see an increased interest in reproducible/containerized/sandboxed environments with docker, flatpak/snap, immutable operating systems, and so on. It’s all about managing complexity.

              • somethingp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                All of that interest is from people making computers, or people who manage security. Not from people that use computers as part of their life/work (in contrast to those who’s work is entirely about the computer itself). From a usability standpoint, this type of sandboxing for every app is cumbersome and all it leads to is users finding unsafe work arounds. I used to be able to use my android phone much more as a regular computer than I can now. And I wanted to make a simple app for myself to allow me to automatically copy and catalog photos from my cameras sd card to an external HDD, and I literally cannot do this without jumping through a million permissions and API hoops on Android even though I never plan on publishing this app for others to use. It became such a pain to figure out how to get access to the folders I would need, I just gave up on the entire project. I essentially needed a tool to systematically copy and rename files, and it’s nearly impossible because of these nonsensical policies.

                • Kogasa@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  All of that interest is from people making computers,

                  like the people who make phones for other people to use

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Until it stops me from doing something I want to do and know is safe like modifying my Obsidian notes that are on Nextcloud from my phone. Why can’t it simply prompt me to give Obsidian rw access to that directory or even have some way to allow me to manually change the permissions myself to get it working.

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The right design decision isn’t necessarily the best for a specific use case. Making the system overall rigid and strict by default makes the whole thing more manageable. Adding features like “user initiated opt-in shared filesystem access for sandboxed apps” increases complexity, hence cost and maintenance burden and likelihood of bugs. Not to say this feature isn’t worth it, but it’s necessary to accept some rough edges in some use cases.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Making the system overall rigid and strict by default makes the whole thing more manageable.

                More manageable for who? Certainly not me. Which, considering I own the device, is bullshit. Desktop apps have had this figured out for decades.

                  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    They’re not taken for granted, they are compensated by the corporations I’m purchasing the device from. Again, these problems have already been solved on desktop for decades. They’re not breaking new ground here.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t you pick on first run?

        It’s a newer api but I know Sync does that, as well as mgit and a few others.