• pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cute, but what problem does this solve? Regardless of what you feel about any particular platform, consolidating multiple pieces of functionality into the highly integrated smartphone platform was a major step forward in mobility. This just feels like a regression.

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Below you will find my highly researched list of advantages over the typical smartphone:

      • Headphone jack
      • Mucho storage space
      • Works without internet connection
      • Free software purity (I don’t know, ask RMS)
      • Coolness
      • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Tbf you can still get a phone with a headphone jack, and with a ton of space. Not that you need a crazy amount for music anyway.

        Also confused about the internet connection part. Even if you only use music streaming services, most let you download your music for offline listening.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m okay with the idea of a piece of tech meant to do a single thing, do it well for hours on end on one charge, while not spying on me in creative ways

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are $10 adapters that convert USB-C to a 3.5 mm port, if that is critical. Or just get any of the wide variety of Bluetooth devices on the market.

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A 3.5mm jack costs fractions of a cent, and I don’t have to carry around a $10 dollar adapter to solve an artificial problem.

          Bluetooth sucks badly, and the wide array of devices on the market have batteries that need to be charged. I’ll stick with the best option if i can thanks, 3.5mm jack.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Okay, but in exchange you’re carrying around a $250 device that is much large than the adapter? That was my point. And for many people, myself included, Bluetooth devices do decently well even if they have their drawbacks.

    • darkamikaze@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it can at least carry 2TB of offline music for you if you still like owning your own music if that’s your thing. It’s an option, nothing wrong with that

        • darkamikaze@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not all smartphones have the storage to store 2TB of songs. Phones with micro SD cards are rare as platinum these days.

          • noobnarski@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lots of chinese phones still have an SD card slot, although its usually in the same location as the second SIM card, so you have to choose.

            My phone is like this and I use the dual SIM feature, as the internal memory is 256gb anyway.

        • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Maybe for people who are not interested in smartphones? Could also be an educational project if you want to dive into embedded systems. You’ll also save battery on your phone.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yup, this just feels like someone trying to make the cassette cool again. There’s a reason it fell out of fashion. If someone wants it, so be it, in the end that’s their business. I just think it’s a little silly to be sprouting more devices (and associated e-waste) when people can stay consolidated in one compact package.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh, I don’t have fond memories of them. Rewinding, lack of metadata, tape getting snarled, no seeking, limited capacity, and limited sound quality. But hey, I certainly have my silly areas so who am I to criticize?