Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 months ago

    As someone who’s an active user and contributor to Fedora: words cannot express enough how much I hate US laws.

    It’s the reason we can’t ship with H.264 hardware decoding out of the box, it’s the reason why we can’t provide access to our project and our community to sanctioned countries (Cuba being one that really hurts me, but mainly Iran right now, which makes me really sad because I’m having to answer people from Iran almost weekly asking on how they can be a part of the project with “unfortunately you can’t”).

    I dream of a day where Fedora’s trademark changed to the hands of a non-profit foundation outside of the US.

      • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I believe some other distros have this issue, but I’m not sure about specific ones. US laws are pretty complicated by themselves, even more when you try to understand how it affects projects from other countries that are trying to be available on US.

    • Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Responses involving, “Did you typo when you said you were from Tehran, Iran? Sometimes autocorrect changes it from sanctioned [foreign capital, foreign nation] - as we both surely know [foreign nation] is sanctioned allowing contributions to US based software projects. Anyway, check out the Git!” are probably forbidden, surely.