FDA says 561 deaths tied to recalled Philips sleep apnea machines::Update from the Food and Drug Agency comes days after Philips said it would stop selling the devices in the U.S.

  • fraksken@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    10 months ago

    Philips said it would stop selling the devices in the U.S.

    cool. So the rest of the world can get stuffed.

  • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s weird they only stop selling them now, it’s been at least a year in France we know it kills people. I believe there is also a trial.

    Why would Phillips remove them in France but keep selling them in the usa ?

    Edit: my bad, it’s been 2 years we know it gives cancer.

      • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Greed and lack of empathy, not capitalism.

        But also they somehow thought they could get away with it in the usa when they declared themselves 2 years ago in France that the foam in their device gives cancer. I really can’t understand the logic, usa is the country of trial and lawyers, they knew they would get sued at some point.

        • mako@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          Greed and lack of empathy

          That’s what keeps capitalism humming along. It’s why a few people own most of everything and the “lucky” Americans will be forced to work until they die. What point were you trying to make when you attempted to correct them by saying that’s not capitalism?

          • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because capitalism basic isn’t greed and lack of empathy, I could choose to invest my capital into nearby companies employing homeless people for instance. That would be capitalism.

            I know lemmy population is mostly very left politically but these kind of «  good socialism against bad capitalism » are nonsense and borderline ridiculous. I’m seriously wondering if there is a mob of edgy teenager promoting their political vision on every thread because it always comes down to « uh bad capitalism » every time I look into comments.

            • mako@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              You can’t fix the problems caused by capitalism with capitalism. Those homeless people employed by that beautiful company in your made up example don’t have a home because companies and the governments they write the laws for value profit over human life. Homelessness is overwhelmingly a mentally health issue which becomes an addiction issue, but here in the US all health care, much less mental health care, is a for-profit venture. And the open market that you seem to respect so much has made renting and home ownership unattainable for countless millions.

              You sound like everyone else who believes everything they learned in econ 101, that capitalism rights itself because it’s in people’s best interests to do so. You’re out of touch with the reality of so many peoples lives, and you only emphasized it with your fantasy about “good capitalism.” You can blame all of Lemmy or all the “brainwashed” people who tell you how far your perception of reality is skewed, but I hope you can continue learning about what life is like for people who don’t have your privilege or luck and are moved to reconsider your stance.

              • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The thing is I’m not saying capitalism is good neither, it sure isn’t looking great in USA. I’m saying it is what people end up doing with it and not everything can be blamed on it.

                We’ll just agree to disagree.

      • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Be happy, you helped make some people at Phillip richer.

        In all seriousness, Phillip itself admitted the foam in their device can make headache, give toxicity and cancer. I’ve not been able to read the official declaration, only news report but if I was you I would check that because when the company itself admit it can give cancer, you know it’s bad.

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 months ago

    More info is needed. Here ya go folks:

    Philips recalled the following devices made between 2009 and April 26, 2021:

    A-Series BiPAP A30
    A-Series BiPAP A40 (ventilator)
    A-Series BiPAP Hybrid A30
    A-Series BiPAP V30 Auto (ventilator)
    C-Series ASV (ventilator)
    C-Series S/T and AVAPS
    DreamStation
    DreamStation ASV
    DreamStation Go
    DreamStation ST, AVAPS
    Dorma 400
    Dorma 500
    E30
    Garbin Plus, Aeris, LifeVent (ventilator)
    OmniLab Advanced+
    REMstar SE Auto
    SystemOne ASV4
    SystemOne (Q-Series)
    Trilogy 100 (ventilator)
    Trilogy 200 (ventilator)
    

    Sauce

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This isnt even about the materials breaking down, every product breaks down eventually. But cars from 30 years ago have better critical air path separation than that… how badly did they fuck up the engineering to even make it possible for housing components to get sucked into the intake?

    Oh, it probably would have cost an additional $0.45 per unit to inject the housing in a different way that provides a hard barrier between the mechanicals and air intake so it got shitcanned…

    • Arcka@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not sure, but your comment seems to imply an assumption that the foam was designed to be external to the air path and is getting unintentionally sucked in? That’s not the case, the foam is literally only inside an “air chamber” that the air directly travels through.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      10 months ago

      Blows gas and pieces of foam into the airway. So it suffocates you when it’s supposed to stop you from suffocating basically.

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 months ago

    Philips said it would stop selling the devices in the U.S

    Lol wtf bro! Just stop selling it! Fuckers will now start selling in in 3rd world countries like China, India etc.

  • Blorper59@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    I use another brand (Resmed) and pulled my old one apart to see what’s inside. They are well engineered - and they need to be, as they run 7-8 hours, every night. They also have quite a bit of soundproofing surounding the pump. Mine had spray expanding foam and the spongy seat padding type, but this is all outside the airflow. I suppose they could use foam inside the air tubes for further sound damping, but it seems a bit dumb as if any breaks off it will go straight up your nose.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Food and Drug Administration says 561 deaths have been reported in connection to recalled Philips devices to treat obstructive sleep apnea and other breathing disorders.

    The grim tally comes days after Philips said it would stop selling the machines in the U.S. in a settlement with the FDA and the Justice Department expected to cost roughly $400 million, the company disclosed in a regulatory filing.

    The tentative agreement, which must be approved by a U.S. court, calls for the company to keep servicing apnea machines already being used while stopping to sell new ones until specific conditions are met.

    Claims for financial losses related to the purchase, lease or rent of the recalled machines can be now be lodged in the wake of a proposed class-action settlement reached in September.

    Claims for financial losses related to the purchase, lease or rent of the recalled devices can be made, with eligible users entitled to:

    Roughly 30 million people have sleep apnea, a disorder in which one’s airways become blocked during rest, interrupting breathing, according to 2022 data from the American Medical Association.


    The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      10 months ago

      Rubbish summary. My first question was “how can a device that basically forces you to breathe, kill you?”

      The Dutch medical device maker has recalled millions of the breathing machines amid reports they were blowing gas and pieces of foam into the airways of those using the devices.

      Polyester-based polyurethane foam used in the devices to reduce sound and vibration can break down, with black pieces of foam or invisible chemicals that can be breathed in or swallowed by the person using the device. “These issues could potentially result in serious injury and require medical intervention to prevent permanent injury,” the FDA stated.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Wow, how can this have been an oversight? Let’s just blow a bunch of microplastics down everyone’s throats.

        Does not even make sense from a business standpoint, if you kill your customers you won’t have customers.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Killing your customers slowly can be extremely profitable, and is preferred to not monetizing the poison at all (tobacco, alcohol, opioids, sugar, fossil fuels).

          If this happened after 20 or 30 years it would be considered normal wear and tear, and well beyond the “usable life” of a product in the age of planned obsolescence.