As a veteran, I feel this. I wish I’d served crack instead too.
Why don’t Presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?
deleted by creator
You’re literally responding to song lyrics
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Before World War I and World War II, many thought things would not escalate until we realised it was far too late. The British intelligence thought the assassination of Franz Ferdinand would only be contained regionally instead of escalating to a world war.
Most wars are class wars and most issues are class issues. But most people are not class conscious. The base tribalism is instead drummed up to distract us from the real root cause. We’re seeing the rise of the far right in many countries such as in Europe, US and India. Most of the rise of the right is due to influx of migrants, who are displaced by neocolonial foreign policies of corporate backed governments and capitalism-induced global warming.
But most people are not class conscious.
I think you’d be surprised. Just most of us realize that socialists are ineffective at accomplishing anything. Simultaneously both naive and arrogant and too obnoxious to be able to create a movement most people would want to be a part of.
Simple truth of it is, in the long run we’re all dead anyway. Better to improve the system we have then wait around for socialists doing endless naval gazing dialectics over which ideological framework a stance on an issue would be in before then deciding whether they’re for it or against it.
We’ll all grow old and die before socialists do anything other than complain about how stupid the workers are for not appreciating in their genius.
Keynes > Marx
Biden > [Do socialists even have their shit together enough to even have a leader?]
You don’t have to be democratic socialist to be class conscious. You just have to be aware that much of inequality and injustices arises from growing wealth disparity.
The Bernie Sanders 1% thing isn’t something no one has heard before.
The problem with Bernie is he thinks democratic socialism is Scandinavian style democracy where free market still exists but heavily regulated. Most Americans confuse between social democracy and democratic socialism. And that turns off Americans with supporting more expansive welfare programs and regulations, aside from decades of broad anti-socialist propaganda.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
NO! Booo! Very ill said!
This must be a troll.
PLENTY of people saw it coming. The majority of people didn’t give a fuck.
This sentiment of ‘I’m not going to fight’ is funny until the war actually starts. And then it’s either you fight early, or you fight late. Sometimes too late.
Nah. I’d legitimately rather kill myself than fight for my government.
Save a shell for me. ♥️✨
War sounds kinda fun tho (please don’t look at my avatar)
Which one?
USA
Fair enough.
Wasn’t that amaricas strategy in the past 2 world wars. Like we basically just waited for everyone to wear echother down.
Until someone was like, check this MF out just sitting there, they’re just waiting it out for everyone else to wear each other down!
Incidentally, this was Russia’s plan, too. In fact, still is. We should really pounce on those fuckers while they’re weak.
Removed by mod
Then you became an enlightened centrist?
that’s the main issue though, at least in the US, many citizens feel it would be better to have a complete clear of the entire country so they likely just wouldn’t fight if invaded, the amount of anarchists and just anti-government folk have been gradually rising ever since the pandemic. It doesn’t seem like health wise the country is doing well regardless of the economy status. It is super demoralizing seeing all the news platforms only focus on external wars or how the south is arguing over if it’s legal to jail someone over abortion that happend outside of state line, meanwhile a good portion of folk despite having one of the lowest unemployment rates in years is still living barely paycheck by paycheck. Most feel there’s just nothing they can do.
They don’t go far enough, we need a complete global makeover. What was that about a Great Reset? Isn’t that their idea? Because honestly it sounds pretty fucking good to me about now…
The USA probably has the most brainwashed people you could imagine, they’ll find all the canon fodder they need for their next war
I figured I’d just fuck off out of here before shit goes down. In fact I have no idea why I’m even living in this shithole instead of a paradise island. It costs about 1/10th as much, is tropical, beautiful, and so poor nobody would ever think of invading it. I don’t know about you but I can make that work.
Something tells me you’re from the USA. There are other Western governments, and other places that are arguably better (as in, more comfortable/safe) to live in. Many people have dependents, or things to loose that they value over one’s life.
So yeah, it may be an option for you but that beautiful tropical island won’t fit millions upon millions of people living in the collective West.
I try not to go too public with where I’m from online, and use multiple accounts and contradict myself just to fuzzle the algorithms.
But I am actually from an (allegedly) very stable and very democratic nation. Allegedly.
Things change, sometimes rapidly, but I’ve seen the writing on the wall for at least two decades now, and honestly I feel like I’m running out of time.
Actually committed now and moving in a few months, permanently. There is nothing left here, and the future is bleak.
(and apropos, I am most certainly not moving to any Western country, or any particularly developed one in the slightest. I think the West is about to find itself in an absolute shitstorm, and soon, and I am NOT getting caught in that crossfire)
Millennials volunteered for Iraq.
That’s scary to know.
Gen x*
I mean it definitely depends on the circumstances. If Russia attacks here then I’m absolutely fighting.
That’s how they do it, you know. Build up the enemy as this absolutely big bad that you feel you have to.
Russia attacks my country
“You know, that’s how they do it, they make Russia feel like the big bad enemy you have to fight against”
Lmao WHAT?!? If they’re literally attacking my country then of course I’m fighting to defend it??
An important detail to notice here is that a user calling themselves kusimulkku is likely to be writing this from Finland. Which may result in an important difference of perspective.
Finland is correct. Though I have no idea what sort of situation those other people assumed to warrant such a claim.
There is the danger of manufacturing consent.
https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/remember-maine-1898
Raising tensions then using an incident to light the touch paper.
Russian’s at the border is one thing.
But the most likely “attack” on the US is going to be much smaller.
Note the Houthis attacking merchant ships. Under a US flag.
There are 2 options
- retaliate.
or
- tell the ships to go round and use sanctions and other non violent diplomatic tools to resolve the situation.
Option 1 is an escalation.
Option 2 is not.
The US military is is an odd position. I’d defend Ukraine from Russia. I’d defend Palestine from Israel. I’d defend Israel from Palestine.
I wouldn’t support an aggressor.
There is a moral obligation to support violence in that it must be a necessary defence.
Joining the US military we’ve grown up seeing the US as an aggressor continuously. Supporting aggressors, not sanctioning them.
Then with Ukraine there is reluctance to help a defender.
A country that invaded nations at the drop of a hat 20 years ago has a recruitment problem. No surprises there.
If Russian troops are crossing the border then it’s Russians who have manufactured the consent for violent action to drive them the fuck away.
I agree, but if that’s the way the US, or any other NATO country, gets attacked I’ll be surprised.
This is not the war that is proposed, it’s a series of proxy wars. Just like Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, and the decades long conflict with Palestine.
Ask if you’ll defend yourself, you’ll say yes.
Ask if you’ll defend others, the answer is usually “it depends”.
Ask if you’ll go fight in a proxy war which protects largely corporate interests, you’ll say no.
Joining the American military is saying yes to all 3. That’s the recruitment issue going on there.
If Russia attacks the US, our government would try to use that as a recruitment tool, and would probably succeed.
Meanwhile the majority of us would be cheering on the Alaskan citizens that are armed for wildlife that would stop a T-70 in its tracks, to say nothing of the poor Russian conscripts.
Nobody look up what Finland was doing in the 1930s.
Why is that relevant
😎
You need to be clearer about what point you’re trying to make or the reader has to choose for you. What I’m getting is
Finnish Great Grandpa did some bad shit, so whatever Russia is doing now is ok
Look mate, all I’m saying is that Russia is saying the same things to their citizens. And Germans were saying the same things to theirs. And the Pope was saying the same things to the crusaders.
Likewise, a country is just imaginary, made by the rich to separate who can exploit the people in a specific geography. By all means, fight for it, but just know you’re being played.
Russia literally attack my country, Russian soldiers are pouring over the border, I’m about to join to defend it
“You know Pope told the same thing to crusaders, besides countries are imaginary, why do you care if you live in your own country or as part of Russia under Putin. You are just being played.”
Lmao, you people can’t be serious, this is beyond fucking stupid
Aight mate, you do you.
wants to defend my country from Russia literally attacking and trying to invade it
“You do you mate”
I’m in awe. This has been the best exchange I’ve had in quite some while. I’m almost too flabbergasted to laugh
I’m just glad you get so much excitement out of my 5 words reply.
I feel dumber for having read this comment.
What makes you think Russia will attack your country?
I’m not sure if you misunderstood the discussion but this is what I wrote (bolded for emphasis)
I mean it definitely depends on the circumstances. If Russia attacks here then I’m absolutely fighting.
I’m saying that if that were to happen, then I’d fight in the WW3.
What if Australia invaded your country? Obviously the if is because you consider it a possibility.
What if Australia invaded your country?
I would defend it.
Obviously the if is because you consider it a possibility.
Not how hypotheticals work but it obviously is a possibility.
Ehhh… Not really. The one thing that the US has over every other nation currently is its deep water Navy. We could project power like that, and have done so for about 80 years now… China is the only nation that is even building a deep water Navy, but they have yet to attempt to project power past one of their neighbors.
Australia has literally zero chance to invade Finland no matter how much shit talking the Russians blame on Finland.
Found the Russia apologist. Obviously Russia was used as an example country because they are actively and illegally invading Ukraine right the fuck now, while threatening to invade the rest of eastern Europe.
And, funnily enough, Alaska. I almost want to see them try that shit.
How am I an apologist for pointing out chicken little bullshit? Do you fantasize about Russia invading your country? Let’s be realistic here, Russia can’t even overtake Ukraine and you think they’re going to take over the world.
Ukraine, Crimea, Georgia…
Pretty soon they’ll be invading Canada, huh?
The person you originally replied to lives in a country bordering Russia that was invaded by them in the past.
About as likely to be invaded as Canada. Just look at how much they’re struggling with Ukraine.
Russia attacks my country
To quote the Greatest President of My Generatoin “We need to fight them over there so we won’t be fighting them over here.”
That’s why I’m enlisting in the Ukrainian National Guard and I hope you’ll all join me.
I’m fine with just sending money and materiel to support the Ukrainian efforts. I’m hoping to avoid fighting in a war.
Why? What difference edoes it make to you who runs the joint?
It makes a huge difference if I live under democracy in Finland or under Putin in Russia. What the fuck are you smoking
Russia has always built itself as an enemy. You’re dumb if you think it’s just propaganda.
And I even specified I was talking about a situation where Russia attacks my country. Fucking lmao, not sure what those other guys are smoking.
If Russia attacks
Don’t worry, we’ve got Sarah Palin on watch.
Are you referring to the infamous Alaska comment? Send Palin to my country, we can give her a spot and binoculars.
I found her comment less ridiculous after learning what separates Alaska & Russia:
Tbf I always thought it was a joke and not serious
Well, good for you. I’m not.
That’s why I was only talking about myself
Ok. Misread your intentions then
Who would you fight? The missile coming at you? I don’t think we would need many soldiers in a fight vs Russia.
If Russia attacks here then I imagine it would be somewhat like in Ukraine where manpower definitely helps.
They can’t attack here like in Ukraine as there is no land to move across. They would have to use their sad navy to try to land troops crossing many miles of ocean out in the open. Not possible.
Not the case here, unfortunately
Of course not. Millennials are too old and unless things kick off in the next couple years, gen z will be too.
What are we calling the generation below them? I’m really losing track nowadays.
Gen A. They’re around middle school and younger now.
A whole generation of Forest Gump’s girlfriend?
Hey. This is a great joke. Thanks.
It took me awhile to get it but I see what you did now
Not really. It could be all hands on deck, if you’re below 40 you’re in.
Uhm, doofus, nobody’s gonna fight in ww3.
Bombs get launched and we ALL die, that’s how ww3 is faught.
It’s frightening how little the younger generations understand about nuclear war.
There have been plenty of wars fought in the age of nuclear weapons that, strangely enough, have not resulted in the use of nuclear weapons. There’s a few of them going on right now, in fact!
Not directly between nuclear powers though.
Which nuclear powers do you foresee entering into direct conflict in a theoretical WW3 scenario based on current conditions?
In context of being a hypothetical world war, I do believe the current major powers, some of which have nukes, need to be involved. By definition, the answer to your question would have to be someone on this list.
I don’t see how the current geopolitical climate results in any of those coming into direct conflict rather than just continuing to wage thinly veiled proxy wars. The only WW3 scenario I can imagine right now looks more like an intensification of the current situation.
I do not see any world wars happening anytime soon either, given a somewhat rational (read non-suicidal) leadership of key nations. The original comment you responded to said that none would survive a nuclear total war, to which you replied that there have been wars fought in the nuclear age. This is true, even to the point of proxy wars between nuclear powers. However, they are not world wars, for which I think the original comment’s argument holds true. In effect the idea is that a world war would almost by definition have some nuclear power on either side.
If a world war can only exist between nuclear powers then does the first one (and most of the second) not count?
deleted by creator
Me looking at the handful of declassified missile defense sites and wondering what shit we have that isn’t known.
Yeah… it’ll just be that simple Mr. Armchair General.
NATO gets assailed and everybody responds, which is the whole point. That’s an unwanted fission excess immediately.
Removed by mod
Netanyahu, Putin, and Kim Jong Un walk into a bar…
You’d be amazed what some good old fashion propaganda will do for you.
The US was so gung-ho after 9-11 they accidentally attacked the wrong country. I know they didn’t have any problem getting troops or buy-in from the people of all ages. It was pretty disgusting how quickly your average citizen bought into the bull-shit the Bush administration was selling when it was obviously a lie.
The US was so gung-ho after 9-11 they accidentally attacked the wrong country.
“accidentally”. Lol.
“Accidentally”. That’s funny. Not only because there was more than one.
This might have happened. But the internet was still in its infancy, with only MSM having capabilities to stream live for the masses. Social media was limited to forums, BBS, news groups and similar, and they were really a niche.
Seeing all the raw footage of wartorn places on sites like Instagram and TikTok today, and even just sharing them in group chats is a whole new angle that wasn’t there before.
They touted the first Iraq war as the first fully televised war.
The MIC were so proud.
Except, unlike Vietnam, the media wasn’t able to to show our dead when they were returned home. So, not fully televised.
Very excellent point, perhaps the best point.
I thought Vietnam claimed that credit.
Dude I don’t make the metrics, all I know is that Iraq was in HD, or something. The whole war was very legal, very cool.
Yeah. For me it was the same with everyone cheering for Ukraine wanting to get into Nato and putting it in their Constitution even though it would never happen. And then everyone acting surprised when Russia invades after they said they would for years. It was so predictable that I can’t help but assume that it was a deliberate trap set for Russia. Russia is wrong, but it was predictable, inevitable. But everyone was suddenly so gung-ho that possible diplomatic solutions to end this senseless war were not demanded by “the left”. Still isn’t.
And kinda the same with Israel now, the Oct.7 was a horrible atrocity and war crime but they blatantly lied to make it sound even more horrible in order to dehumanize and justify the war crimes they are committing now. But so many on the left are still screaming death! and the news in my “progressive” country is reporting complete propaganda.
Gen-Z is presumably just as easy to brainwash for total war with the right propaganda. Or maybe they will grow up being more resistant to it.
when Russia invades after they said they would for years.
They absolutely didn’t. In fact, Putin ruled out war against Ukraine on many occasions, both before and after the invasions of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
It was so predictable that I can’t help but assume that it was a deliberate trap set for Russia.
Up until the tanks crossed the border people didn’t believe Russia would invade because they couldn’t believe the Russians could be that stupid. To concoct a plot on such a massive scale with a payoff that relied on the rank idiocy of Russian command doesn’t seem very smart
Putin ruled out war against Ukraine on many occasions, both before and after the invasions of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
Well…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prelude_to_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine
In December 2021, Russia advanced two draft treaties that contained requests for what it referred to as “security guarantees”, including a legally binding promise that Ukraine would not join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and a reduction in NATO troops and materiel stationed in Eastern Europe, threatening unspecified military response if those demands were not met in full. NATO rejected these requests, and the United States warned Russia of “swift and severe” economic sanctions should it further invade Ukraine.
Are you denying this happened?
Personally I thought these demands weren’t too outrageous. With the outright rejection it was clear to me that an invasion was very likely.
Weather it all “doesn’t seem smart” or “is stupid” doesn’t really matter. What is pissing me off though is that the US is doing things like that all the time except the “intellectuals” always listen to their reasons and repeat them. But if others act in the exact same way it’s just amoral. What bothers me isn’t so much the bigotry (one set of rules for us, another for the others), but that this way any attempt at peaceful diplomatic resolution is prevented. This makes it war propaganda. You want to negotiate with terrorists?
Really our western civilization hasn’t learned a damn thing.
December 2021 is two months before the invasion, not “years”, like you wrote previously. I agree that once the Russians stationed their army at the Ukrainian border and threatened to invade, that the invasion became fairly predictable.
Personally I thought these demands weren’t too outrageous.
Russia wanted to dictate the military movements and foreign policy of nine countries, otherwise they would attack a different country from those nine. I don’t believe anyone has ever tried to pull a more outrageous stunt. Those demands were meant to provide cover for aggression, not to start a negotiation. It worked on you.
the US is doing things like that all the time
The last time the USA waged a war to take territory from a neighbour was in 1848, nearly two hundred years ago, and I don’t think they’ve ever made demands of one country and then waged war on a completely different country when they weren’t met. They do not, in fact, do things like that all the time. You can object to a lot of what the USA does, but even at their worst, they don’t act like this.
For someone who criticizes others for accepting justifications for war, you sure are very accepting of justifications for war, provided the Russians are the ones doing the justifying.
Of course Russia is playing games but it’s a lie that the US and the western colonial powers don’t do the same thing. This is geopolitics. That’s is not moral relativism, it’s just historical facts.
If you are unwilling to negotiate and compromise with your enemy and rather go to war, then that’s a consequence based on your action.
And to justify this you need to adopt actual fascist ideology based on the myth that the US and Nato, when they do the exact same things, somehow have good reasons. Because we are “pure” and “moral”. But when others, “inferior” cultures do it it’s just terrorism or aggression. And they can’t be trusted so negotiation is useless.
I’m just shocked how well that propaganda still works. We haven’t learned a god damn thing.
If you are unwilling to negotiate and compromise with your enemy and rather go to war
Who went to war in Ukraine?
the US and Nato, when they do the exact same things, somehow have good reasons.
But they don’t do the exact same things. The USA and NATO don’t annex parts of other countries.
But they don’t do the exact same things. The USA and NATO don’t annex parts of other countries.
I was being generous, obviously the US is far worse in terms of body count, injuries, displaced people, devastation and ruined countries, regimes changed and democracies suppressed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States#21st-century_wars
Of course Russia sees Ukraine joining Nato as an act of aggression. They said this and that they won’t tolerate it. They said it over and over again. And Ukraine put it in their constitution and warmongers like Stoltenberg kept encouraging them. This was all put in motion in 2014 already.
You can say the war is worth it to not loose Crimea and in order to damage and isolate Russia. Ukraine certainly did think so, they wanted a permanent irrevocable break from any interference from Russia. They knew the war was coming and didn’t want to negotiate. Fine.
Personally I’d have preferred a compromise and have peace and a chance for improved relations later. Call me a pacifist.
Taiwan seems to be next on the agenda, since the US is gung ho on making it their “close military partner” in their strategy to encircle China. If you don’t learn from history you’re doomed to repeat it.
But everyone was suddenly so gung-ho that possible diplomatic solutions to end this senseless war were not demanded by “the left”. Still isn’t.
What diplomatic solution? Unless you’re selling parts of Ukraine for peace, which isn’t a long term plan, the only solution is Russia leaving.
Russia isn’t going to give Crimea / Sevastopol back, and they do have some legitimate claim to it.
If you’re unwilling to consider compromise to achieve a diplomatic solution you are making it inevitable that this will be decided through the use of war. And that is what I call “gung-ho”.
Also ironic that you’re talking about selling parts of Ukraine off for peace, because they are currently selling their whole country to the west for continued military aid. And they’ll definitely going to want to see a return on that investment. So foolish.
PS: Lol this reminds me how Quark basically said it best: https://youtu.be/hdQcGzbpN7s
they do have some legitimate claim to it.
They recognized it as part of Ukraine on independence and then reaffirmed it with the Budapest memorandum. They have no claim, it was naked aggression
They altered the terms of the deal. I think they expected to being able to keep their main fleet headquarters and have friendly relations with Ukraine, not a nato armed country on their doorstep 🤷
But this is the problem: You think that Russia should abide by moral arguments of right and wrong, while the US and Nato clearly isn’t. They are pursuing their own geopolitical agenda, but you judge them with two different sets of values. “Russia can’t be trusted because they are inherently evil! Diplomatic solutions are useless!”
The result is war, a country destroyed, many lives lost, many refugees, a century of debt and neo-liberalism for those that survive. That is the result. And there WAS a diplomatic solution on the table.
So Gen Z and Millennials are just as susceptible to cries for “total war” as all the stupid Muppets that came before them. So fuck you for being just as stupid as our generation 🤣
They did you know that Ukraine is one of the big bread baskets of the world? This might come in handy when climate change creates food insecurity. Luckily our motivations are purely altruistic and based on higher morality…
They altered the terms of the deal. I think they expected to being able to keep their main fleet headquarters and have friendly relations with Ukraine
This is incredibly revisionist. Ukraine very much wanted and tried to remain friendly with Russia, and Russia losing the lease on the ports was never in question before Russia invaded.
It was Putin who demanded Ukraine choose between Russia and Europe, and then invaded Crimea and the East when he didn’t like their choice.
and they do have some legitimate claim to it.
cool, cool, cool… so which part of your country would you be willing to shave off to an invading party on the promise that’s all they’ll take?
Puerto Rico? Now wait, Florida obviously.
Nah fuck ya’ll Ima sign up if we have an enemy worth fighting for the first time in my life. I’ll push the lines to Moscow, Beijing, idgaf: dictatorships will destroy us all if left unchecked, make life not worth living for everyone. The whole time I’m deployed I’m going to be using absentee ballots, and if I make it back I’m gonna use my new cred to run for office and fight the corporations, too.
If you are in the US, you might wanna prevent your own dictatorship first.
Definitely on the todo list, but honestly the options seem mutually exclusive given the friendliness between our wannabe dictator and his foreign dictator benefactor.
Do what lol. Yeah everyone says we have guns to “stop tyranny” but the national guard would kick our ass.
I’ll tell the freezing homeless about how you’re heroically dying to defend their freedom and prosperity.
Dictatorships are bad
Well you have homeless people!
Uhhh
There’s a pretty big leap from “Dictatorships are bad” to “Invade Moscow and Beijing”.
How about
I want to fight dictatorships
Well you have homeless people!
Not sure how you could turn that without it sounding like a total non sequitur
You think they’ll be happier in a wartorn dictatorship? I don’t pretend the USA is some beacon of hope with its gerrymandered failing democracy, but it sure as fuck beats Putin or Jinping calling the shots.
Xi Jinpooh
Disgustingly bloodthirsty.
You think there’s a chance of boots-on-the-ground conflict with these people? No. Swords get crossed and everyone’s dust.
You think it makes sense for Russia to lose as much as it has in the Ukrainian conflict? That is the thing with authoritarian states, they’re more aggressive and make more costly mistakes. They already have nuclear weapons and they aren’t using them. If I were afraid of nuclear war then I would have lived all my life and all of its remainder in fear because there has always been some madman with a finger over the button, I’m not just going to give up and bend over for him.
The mad men would survive in their five-star underground ritz-carlton
Survive and do what? There is nothing waiting for them outside of that tunnel.
Beijing and Moscow will defend themselves with nukes before they allow their capitals to be taken. America would do the same.
LMAO defend with nukes
If they get desperate enough to arm nuclear warheads then their country is already at the verge of collapse. There is no benefit to firing nukes even as a last resort, it does nothing to improve your situation.
deleted by creator
As long as they are recruiting the dumbest and poorest from your failing high-schools you’ll always have enough for your wars.
I’ll defend my country, but I’m not going to engage in an armed conflict overseas.
IMO, as long as it’s not directly threatening me and my life, then I will simply see another WW as old people who are angry at other old people, sending me off to die for their grudge.
No thanks chief. Stick me in prison if you’re so inclined but I’m not about to kill some poor kid I’ve never met and I don’t have anything against, just because you can’t use your words.
✌️
Where does the line for “directly threatening” go tho?
Basically two things: if there’s combat happening on my countries land, and if there’s a well known intent to bring the fighting to my country.
The first gun they’ll give me I’ll aim at myself and be done with it.
You can aim it at your commanding officer first!
Ah the Afghani strategy.
Throwing a grenade in a CO’s tent is a tradition from Vietnam, and I’m hoping it makes a come back.
RIP Pat Tillman.
Turkish firearms have a protection on the trigger to prevent you from committing die
Where there’s a will there’s a way.
Personally I’d choose a grenade pressed against my skull. No chance of survival when your brain is quite literally puréed
Good point, grenade it is.
Interesting, how would that work? An extra trigger you need to press before it fires which you can’t reach? That would seem like a hassle on the battlefield, if that safety would make it even the tiniest bit more difficult to fire when an enemy approaches.
It’s this triangle beyond the trigger that prevents you from accessing it if you’re facing down the barrel
Millennial here. Can confirm, I’ll be staying home and doing my own thing. One live isn’t worth more then another and I’m not going to war. If you’re going to put me in jail because I refuse, then maybe I need to find a different country to live in.
On the very off chance they restarted the draft, there are tons of reasons the Pentagon would fight conscription, make sure you know asylum procedures or have the stuff ready to immigrate. Run don’t try to just ignore the draft.
They, the last time they did the draft, didn’t just throw normies into jail, they grabbed them then kicked them over to the military and then if you ran away and got brought back after being AWOL they just deployed you and let happen what happened, regulars frequently discovered that these sorts had… uhh… “accidents” at a more frequent rate.
Millennial here, I’m pushing 40, you wouldn’t want me even if I was willing to fight.
Well in times of desperation they probably don’t care. If it’s real bad it’s not “can you hold a gun?” it’s “can you take a bullet?”
Anyway, just do a Ted Nugent. Take as many drugs as you can and shit yourself.
Takes notes
Yeah, remember, Hitler pressed kids and elderly men into fighting when the Red Army was marching on Berlin. Desperation leads to that kind of madness.
If you run against a war with Russia then the war will catch you eventually. Are you planning to live the rest of your days in an obscure South American nation?
As opposed to to your life ending in a few short months on a battlefield?
Sure. Why not.
It doesn’t have to be Sth America. US men dodging the draft were given political asylum in Canada or Sweden during the Vietnam war and an estimated 60-100,000 fled the US.
So it is actually:
Decades in another modern western nation or weeks/months on a battle field?
Easy choice.
I asked it in question form because I was legitimately curious. Where do you plan to go while the world you leave behind devolves into an authoritarian hell? What other “modern western nation” would be left if Russia and/or China expands all the way across Europe as well as onto US Shores?
You don’t have a second life to flee to if the west fails to defend itself.
Please stop recruiting in the comment section.
I asked a legitimate question. I want to rationalize running away against a threat like that, I would never sell my soul to the military complex for anything other than necessity, but it absolutely doesn’t make sense other than for selfish shortsighted cowardice.
Nah fuck ya’ll Ima sign up if we have an enemy worth fighting for the first time in my life.
Yet you say things like this.
Yes, because as I explained, running away against a threat like that doesn’t make any sense. Did the sentence structure confuse you?
then maybe I need to find a different country to live in
I was born and raised in Germany and never changed my foreign citizenship, it was always on the bucket list. My husband immigrated in 2019, and since 2022 I am freaking out at the thought that we would change citizenship. Being a foreign citizen sucks sometimes, but in case of war it is extremely beneficial. Avoid drafting at home, avoid drafting where you live.
So, moving in case of a war would be more than beneficial, you just got to do it early on, before they close borders. We had friends dropping everything and packing just their cat and passports the same night Russia attacked Ukraine.
All the other comments seem to be about the US. I’m not sure how Canada will be in time of war but I agree with you. Being a foreign citizen is worth it. If I’m to leave, id go to The Netherlands but I really do not want to leave Canada.
The longer this shit goes on, the more I’m starting to worry. I hope it ends soon.
My kid doesn’t particularly want to fight, but she’s ok with guns and convinced anarchy will be good for the environment?! Idk, she’s not dumb, but these kids have less stake in the institutions than MAGA retirees…
Does she mean “anarchy” or Anarchism, a stateless classless society based on voluntary associations?
She means whatever The Last Of Us was
Well if you are talking about purely helping the environment, at the cost of human societies, maybe that situation would be better for the earth overall lol
The fact they will never have the chance to enter the ownership class keeps manifesting in new and interesting ways in the media, at their jobs, in their schools, amongst their social circles. The decline in availability of material wealth destabilizes all.
Yall ever seen Daybreakers? It’s kinda corny but it feels more relevant every day.
convinced anarchy will be good for the environment
glances at Haiti’s environment
I’m not feeling it.
Haiti was a slave rebellion that provoked the fear and ire of generations of wealth.
Long after the rebellion, modern Haiti is a lawless nightmare, complete with natural disaster inflicted devastation and chronic foreign occupation.
I’ll take the strict authorizatism of Japan or the brutal backwards theocracy of Florida over that kind of anarchy.
I think they probably meant some form of anarchisme
