• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    They would have had to make severe changes for Google+ to be competitive with Twitter and Threads. It was terrible.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some sites just are before their time. “Broadcast.com” was a website in 1995 dedicated to streaming shows and movies. In 1999 it was sold to Yahoo! for $5.7 billion. It failed and is considered one of the worst purchases in tech history (this was before Twitter). In 2007, Netflix would launch its TV show and movie streaming services and grow to be worth $197 billion.

    • Cliv Henby@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Classic Yahoo!. Just like their one billion Tumblr purchase later on. They had no idea what to do with it until they sold it for peanuts years after.

    • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s not enough that you have a good idea it has to be at the right time as well. Netflix had the perfect business model to launch into streaming when it did. You had the rise of the internet and people slowly shifting away from physical media. You had the downfall of blockbuster. And they had built a user base with their dvd mailing service that they could ease into online streaming as they built their online library. It was perfectly timed and everyone jumped on board.

      Now the tables have turned though. You have a dozen competing streaming services and they’re putting out better content and backing their series when Netflix just cancels everything. As the streaming services merge Netflix is going to struggle to beat their catalogs so it might not be that long before we think of Netflix like we think of blockbuster.

  • moonsnotreal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was one of the few people who actually used google+. It really wasn’t that bad honestly.

      • TheRedBadger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a good group of friends use it and that made it really fun. I remember the product itself being great initially. It just never gained any users.

        • Ken Oh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, I know of certain communities that used it very often. It was pretty much the place to go if you wanted to talk tabletop RPG. That’s why I’m really counting on the Fediverse. Find your clan, build interest in what you’re interested in, and not get enshittified and/or shut down by the whims of corp execs.

  • Petri@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering what Google did to the jabber protocol, we can all be glad they gave up, IMO.

  • wick@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone says it was crap, and it was, but I’d still use it rn. If I was, the number of companies stealing my data would be 2(probably many more, but you get the idea) Microsoft for my OS and google for everything else.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see Google/aLpHaBeT being better, if I’m honest. They’re both giant corporations doing giant corporation stuff. Look at how Youtube’s changed.

  • anlumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering that it’s Google, they might have canceled it right when it took off.