Bananas are ridiculously cheap even up here in Canada, and they aren’t grown anywhere near here. Yet a banana can grow, be harvested, be shipped, be stocked, and then be purchased by me for less than it’d cost to mail a letter across town. (Well, if I could buy a single banana maybe…or maybe that’s not the best comparison, but I think you get my point)

Along the banana’s journey, the farmer, the harvester, the shipper, the grocer, the clerk, and the cashier all (presumably) get paid. Yet a single banana is mere cents. If you didn’t know any better, you might think a single banana should cost $10!

I’m presuming that this is because of some sort of exploitation somewhere down the line, or possibly loss-leading on the grocery store’s side of things.

I’m wondering what other products like bananas are a lot cheaper than they “should” be (e.g., based on how far they have to travel, or how difficult they are to produce, or how much money we’re saving “unethically”).

I’ve heard that this applies to coffee and chocolate to varying extents, but I’m not certain.

Anyone know any others?

  • MisterChief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree with you but there are more ethical ways to eat meat while also saving money. Last year my wife and I purchased 1/4 of an entire cow from a farm about 35 miles north of us (friends and family bought the other 3/4). This cow was responsibly raised, grass fed, on a small, local farm. We received 200 pounds of meat with probably a dozen different cuts of meat. This includes dozens of pounds of excellent steak and the meat is simply amazing. We will definitely be going this route moving forward as we averaged the price per pound to ~$4/lb which is far less than the local grocery.

    I understand this isn’t possible for everyone as we also had to purchase a chest freezer which requires space but has made our grocery bill far smaller and the meat we are eating much better in many ways.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is that you are still contributing to demand for meat. It would be impossible to meet all of the current demand by “ethical” means, so the only way for meat to become more ethical across the whole industry is for the demand for meat to go down massively (or the supply is reduced by legislation). And I don’t see that legislation being likely if people are still so invested in eating meat.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        the only way for meat to become more ethical across the whole industry is for the demand for meat to go down massively (or the supply is reduced by legislation).

        this presupposes that ethical production is not the norm despite animal welfare laws and humane slaughter being the norm in the entire developed world, and also shows a great lack of imagination and a misunderstanding of economic theories.

        industry creates is own demand. you aren’t going to stop big meat by buying beans. there use no amount of beans you can buy that will change how many head of cattle a rancher keeps.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Factory farming is indeed legal. You seem to be suggesting that it is ethically defensible as well. That’s a serious stretch if you know what it really looks like, even in the most restrictive jurisdictions, i.e. Western Europe. The only charitable explanation is that you have not looked into the subject very deeply.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            what I said is that animal welfare laws and humane slaughter laws are the norm in the western world. I said nothing about legality of factory farming implying morality. I’m saying there are legal restrictions to ensure it is humane.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yes, and I am saying that you clearly do not understand the reality of what goes on in the average factory farm. Or do not care. But I prefer to imagine that it’s ignorance, that is less disturbing.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                you have no basis for these accusations. you have no idea what I know or what I care about.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Even if the cow is responsibly raised, there’s still the question of how it was conceived. No farmer simply let’s a bull on top of a cow, since our modern cows are too big to safely mate. So usually a cow is artificially inseminated, which is an inherently violent procedure. The milk industry could simply not exist without this institutionalized rape

      • Slowy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s only really true in dairy. Most meat cows are conceived using ‘natural cover’, where several bulls are just left with the ladies to do their thing.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        As you said, they can’t mate… so what’s your solution? Let them go extinct and we lose not only a beautiful creature but a significant part of our species food source and history? We’ve been drinking milk and eating beef since the dawn of animal husbandry

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wait you’re saying it’s better to be genetically experimented on, caged, forced to breed, and be killed in your early adulthood than not have children?

          That’s it’s actually more ethical to make a creature who you later kill for your own pleasure than not to do that? because the alternative is only wild cows and cowlike creatures existing?

          They’re living beings, not museum exhibits ffs. Species don’t have preferences, individuals do.

    • otp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wish I could do that. Gotta save up for a chest freezer and hope I can make it work! Lol