• Drusas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would point out that hydropower may be renewable but isn’t necessarily environmentally friendly. Especially if you live somewhere with salmon.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same issue as nuclear though, building a dam takes years, time we don’t really have.

            • SolarMech@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, we are terribly behind schedule and will take losses for it (in what form I do not know, but for sure it won’t be pretty).

              But we need more and more energy and will need more, and even that growth in that graphic is not enough to prevent fossil fuel use from growing. At least until people wisen up that we’ll just need to learn to make do with less energy per capita… I’m not convinced that part will ever happen.

              Not to mention I’m not sure how much wind and solar you can do at the same time in the world. At some point everyone will need the same materials…

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      With proper midigations it’s fast more eco friendly than the natural gas power plants were still building more of to make up for the fact that solar only ouputs in the day and we can only spin up new lithium mines and battery factories so fast.