A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

    • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh yep, you seem to have a flexible mentality, open to debate and not demonizing others, the opposite of what fascists typically do.

      And there’s the DARVO. That didn’t take much time.

      If foetuses are babies to anti-abortionists (you’ve dropped the pro-life facade) then anti-abortionists need science lessons, because foetuses are not babies.

      Since anti-abortionists don’t consider women as human beings possessing equal human rights, they don’t care about any baby born or unborn from her. Indeed, they think they have the right to dictate to women on what her rights should be, ignoring that she is born with inalienable basic rights. “Born with” not ‘unborn/ in-utero’ with.

      A right to life without right to agency is slavery. Do you understand that anti-abortionists want women to be slaves?

        • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thank you for making clear

          1. your utter contempt for women,
          2. your denial of women as human beings with human rights, and
          3. your misconception that you and other anti-abortionists are arbiters of human rights

          ps: How is an unwanted pregnancy is a “self-imposed situation”? Is it your understanding that women are capable of parthenogenesis?

    • Pegatron@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All the pro life arguments are new. Theyre disingenuous and hypocritical. The modern pro life movement was cooked up by hardcore right wingers when they lost the fight against civil rights , in a transparent attempt to create a new voting bloc. Before the 1960s, the Baptists and Methodists were pro abortion and called it a Catholic issue.

      Person hood is a red herring. Even if you accept fetal person hood, no one owes another person the use of their body.

      Lastly, legislators have no place in medical decisions. Doctors are not terminating viable fetuses in the third trimester and never have. There were less than 10 third trimester abortions in the US per year and all we’re either to save the life of the mother or to remove a fetus that had a fatal defect. Banning the procedure will only have deleterious effects and keep doctors from performing vital life saving procedures. We have already seen this in Ireland and central America.

      • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They are not pro-life. If they were pro-life they would work to make life good/ better for those who they insist birth children and for those who they should be born.

        They are pro-slavery, Forcing/ coercing women to be incubators against their will is sexual slavery. They refuse to consider women as equal human beings with equal rights to men, and seek to diminsh women’s independence by forcing on her (and only her, men are not held accountable) to the unwanted burden of gestating, birthing, and caring for children, even at the cosf of her physical and mental well-being.

        Their call of “fetal personhood” is a tool to emotionally manipulate people (“won’t you think of the children?”), while they deny actual living persons their personhood. All their actions & words are geared towards dehumanizing women.

        Tellingly, they also are not against child labour (“wont you think of the billionaire’s profits?”), once a child is born. Their goal is to deny women their personhood, bind women to sexual slavery, and ensure the wealthy have a supply of cheap & easily available labour.