A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

  • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh yep, you seem to have a flexible mentality, open to debate and not demonizing others, the opposite of what fascists typically do.

    And there’s the DARVO. That didn’t take much time.

    If foetuses are babies to anti-abortionists (you’ve dropped the pro-life facade) then anti-abortionists need science lessons, because foetuses are not babies.

    Since anti-abortionists don’t consider women as human beings possessing equal human rights, they don’t care about any baby born or unborn from her. Indeed, they think they have the right to dictate to women on what her rights should be, ignoring that she is born with inalienable basic rights. “Born with” not ‘unborn/ in-utero’ with.

    A right to life without right to agency is slavery. Do you understand that anti-abortionists want women to be slaves?

      • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thank you for making clear

        1. your utter contempt for women,
        2. your denial of women as human beings with human rights, and
        3. your misconception that you and other anti-abortionists are arbiters of human rights

        ps: How is an unwanted pregnancy is a “self-imposed situation”? Is it your understanding that women are capable of parthenogenesis?