Always good to see someone in the industry push back on all of these shitty tactics the AAA publishers want to push.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m at 750 hours in this game which I spent $70 on. More games like this please. Even if they’re multi years apart I’d rather play a game like BG3 that has immense replayability than some random looter shooter that is trying to mine my wallet using every dark pattern known to humanity.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      11 months ago

      I swore off buying ‘new’ games close to their release dates because I was sick of overpriced, unfinished games that are just trying to squeeze every cent out of me. Then BG3 came out and everyone raved how great it was, but I stuck to my principles and said I’d play it a year or so after its release. Then someone pointed out to me that the game plays well, has no charge for online play, doesn’t have microtransactions, and is complete. So I bought it, figuring that this is the type of game we should be rewarding, and I’ve not been disappointed.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be entirely fair, BG3 has its share of bugs and act 3 is not as polished as the first two.

        But still, it is by far the most polished AAA game I’ve seen in a long time, and very satisfying, too. So I’m ok with some roughness

        • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          In fairness, pretty much all games have some bugs, even far after launch. The issue is launching games that are clearly not finished.

      • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        My husband has a game pass sub for Xbox and he’s only bought 3 games this year; Diablo 4, Mortal Kombat, and BG3. Diablo 4 got broken almost immediately with shitty patches and he seriously regrets wasting the money. Mortal Kombat at least will be a slow burner as they space out the drops for the extra characters. But BG3 he’s been playing non-stop since Thanksgiving. (Like to the point where he checked in with me to ask if I was annoyed at listening to the audio constantly.) That game was well worth the price I just wish more games were like this.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          (Like to the point where he checked in with me to ask if I was annoyed at listening to the audio constantly.)

          I remember asking my other half if the sound was annoying her, and she told me she enjoys the stories in the game.

          • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I enjoyed the story of the game but after watching Asterion’s sacrifice ritual for the tenth time I put my earbuds in and listened to a podcast for a bit. 😂

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Played D4 because my friends were playing it. It’s such a boring piece of shit. Somehow it loses everything fun the past 2 entries had.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        As far as intellectual properties go, yes. But, I’d argue that these two games also show us how the IP’s are less relevant than how good the game is and how it’s monetized (or in the case of BG3, not at all).

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t even care about the replayability. I can see myself at some point going for another run at BG3, but that’s a big commitment and I think I’m going to play BG1 and 2 before then, and plenty of other games.

      I care if it’s an interesting and enjoyable experience. I’d gladly play another Outer Wilds, even though it’s hardly replayable, because it was such a good and unique experience. I don’t care to play yet another Assassin’s Creed or whatever other garbage that isn’t interesting after you’ve tried it once and also purposefully wastes your time with stuff that is not designed to improve the experience, only playtime.

      • thoro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I sometimes really don’t like the “hours of entertainment” argument because it almost overvalues bloated experiences over tight ones.

        I’ve played <=3 hour games that have left more impact than some 200 hour games

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would say 99% of the time if the game took 100+h to play and was a story focused game then it was a waste of time. BG3 is an exception here. From a quick search, RDR2 takes 50h and it isn’t a short game. Would you watch a 100+h movie? Of course not. There’s almost no way a well told story is taking that long, unless it’s some kind of Immersive experience or something.

          That said, plenty of non-story games will take much longer. If the focus is good gameplay, there’s a near limitless amount of time it can take. If there’s story interwoven, it could take any amount of time. I’ve put far more than 100h into a ton of indie games that do interesting things with their gameplay. You just don’t see that experimentation coming from the AAA space normally because it’s not guaranteed profit.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              True, but even then it’d have to be 100 episodes if every episode is 1h, which it usually isn’t. That’s be around 10 or more seasons, depending on the show. I can’t think of a show with that many episodes off the top of my head. I’m sure it exists, but it’s a hell of a lot. Game of Thrones is apparently 70h14m. If your story is taking more time to tell than GoT, it’s probably taking too long.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            plenty of non-story games will take much longer

            Yup. Satisfactory doesn’t have much of a story (although it’s still early access) but I think I’m cloae to 1,000 hours on it.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I like the idea of Satisfactory, but I can’t enjoy it for some reason. I’ve played too much Factorio and it has too many quality of life things that Satisfactory is missing. With the number of overhaul mods, there’s no end to how much Factorio can be played either.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bought it when the alpha was released.

      Like two years of act 1 had me around 200 hours before it even released. Act 1 did seem bigger back then tho, the intro especially.

      I’ve moved from PC to PS5 since and I’m definitely going to rebuy on PS5 eventually. It’s the only game I still play on PC these days.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      people generally dont have the time to go through an rpg, hence why rpgs in general are seen as niche in terms of overall sales as a genre. this includes mmos, where mmos were a lot more plentiful 2 or even a decade ago, compared to now.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d happily pay, say, $10 for a dlc that adds actual content when the base game is absolutely solid or excellent. What I won’t pay for is excessively expensive dlc or dlc that adds very little. I am also heavily unlikely to purchase any dlc that is poorly reviewed, even for a good game.

      Shame things like that are so rare. Hoping BG3’s success opens the doors again.

      • RinseDrizzle@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        FromSoft immediately springs to mind for DLC I’ll happily throw cheddar at. They always add a hefty chunk of new weapons/armor, new areas to explore, and spicy new boss fights that fuck my shit up.

        Heavily biased, they’re one of my favorite developers, but definitely never regret throwing money at FromSoft crew.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Man fromsoft has me kinda mad tho. I paid full price for ds1 (prepare to die ed) years ago and had plenty of fun gittn gud (except pvp i was always a scrub).

          Im happy with the money i spent and the time i had, BUT!

          When they released the newest version which was basically just the qol improvements, 60fps mod, and dsfix rolled into it they had the fuggen gall to try and charge me 20 bucks to upgrade.

          Now, i can’t show my friends my favorite version because you can’t even buy mine. I have a game deliberately ruined for profit reasons in my steam library, and all the hours ive spent on their games and all the fun ive had, all have this black mark now. I keep thinking as i play elden ring, well they do it to this one too? Will this happen to all my fromsoft titles? I don’t know, and can no longer as easily recommend them to my friends. Fromsoft cost themselves a lot of goodwill from me, all for a measly 20 bucks.

    • ClaireDeLuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tbh I really enjoy shorter games that are reasonably priced.

      I probably only find the time to play 1-2 150+ hr game a year. The rest of my free time is spent socializing, dealing with shit like college, or playing shorter games that I can knock out in multiple 1-2 hour sessions within two weeks

      I hate how so many games are demanding of your time today, or feed off that annoying FOMO feeling.

      I’m happy that I know Baldurs gate will always be there and I’m really not going to miss out on anything important. Maybe I’ll get to it next year lol

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The campaign only takes like 40 hours maybe. 60 for your first run if you’re an explorer. I only have so much time in it because I want to see every cut scene and that takes multiple characters. You could definitely play BG3 in shorter sessions. It’s very slow paced if you want it to be.