• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    limitations on the amount of time that a performance replica can be employed without further payment, and consent.

    So games will be removed from shelves later on because the AI voice passed its expiry date and the developers didnt want to or couldnt afford to renew it? The same exact problem we have seen lately with why certain games are no longer available due to music licenses?

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s OK, the AI will allow companies to churn out low effort content for live service games, and the license only has to last until the game ceases to make money and the servers get shut down.

    • bogdugg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well, there’s two ways you could interpret that:

      • As you say, ‘shelf life’, how long they can sell the game with their voice in it
      • Or, ‘voice time’, as in, contracts are negotiated in total duration of voice lines. Exceeding that number requires renegotiation.

      I suspect it’s the latter as that is more similar to how voice work is already done, to my understanding.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That would be ridiculous, and make generated lines even less useful than simple recordings. Presumably they mean new lines cannot be generated, past a certain date. That’d let the studio continue doing the character without needing the actor… in that game, for a while.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why would I want a fictional character to sound like a specific real person?

    Or, framing the question differently: what actor plays Dave The Diver onscreen? Because the answer is what this technology will do for audio.

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are cool use cases for this such as having NPCs say player-picked names for their character (instead of saying a generic name/title like in current RPGs). I don’t know if it’s worth it though.

        • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          To make it sound like the rest of the character’s dialogue. They’re probably not going to train this on the VA’s “normal” voice, that sounds useless.

            • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Are you suggesting replacing voice actors with a completely computer generated voice, for all voice lines? That hasn’t sounded good ever, especially in terms of intonation and emotions.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                That’s what this already does.

                We are talking about a completely computer-generated voice. But for some reason we’re only talking about cases where it’s modeled as closely as possible on one specific human being.

                • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Sure, and if it purely takes text as input and you use it to make voices for an entire game it’s going to be bad too. I’m talking about supplementing voices with snippets that they can’t know in advance, such as the player name.