• Jknaraa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s actually a really good analogy, because it can only run on fully-capitalist hardware.

    • 0xb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Amazing how every single part of your comment is so wrong.

      It’s actually a really good analogy,

      Not an analogy, an example. Those two are different things.

      because it can only run on

      No, it can run on many things, including open source collaborative hardware that exists.

      fully-capitalist hardware.

      What the hell even is that? Fun fact: until very recently most of the computer hardware was made in communist China. I know, scary. And now that a lot of effort is being made to get that production out of there, those efforts are being sponsored by public money to an incredible degree. Billions of dollars of taxes (you know, community resources) are being poured into that because big corporations are the biggest lovers of government handouts.

      • Jknaraa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it can run on many things, including open source collaborative hardware that exists

        Please explain to me where this “open source collaborative” Internet hardware is on which you run your bitcoin network.

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: until very recently most of the computer hardware was made in communist China. I know, scary.

        China hasn’t been communist in a long time.